The Russian military intervention in Syria has produced a lot of interesting fallout. It is now becoming clear that the militants whom Russia is targeting were financed by the United States (via the CIA) for the specific purpose of overthrowing the legitimate Syrian government, and that most (if not all) of these militants are one and the same as ISIS, who have been responsible for much of the havoc wrought on the Syrian nation and surrounding regions over the last few years. It is also becoming clear that the one of the goals of U.S. intervention in Syria over that same time frame was delusional, for the U.S wasted over $500 million trying to raise an independent militia (and state) who were "moderate". The word "moderate" should be understood to mean, "friendly to the interests of the United States."
What are those interests? They are, by and large, corporate commercial interests. The goal of American foreign policy seems to be to create a world which is friendly to a economic order ruled by the United States, a world which doesn't mind being exploited by the United States, a world whose citizens come to resemble the citizens of the United States in their consumerism and utter dependence on the commercial networks established by the corporate masters of the United States. Consumerism is but a facet of hedonism. Temptations to hedonism are therefore used by the United States to export "democracy" to "markets" closed by national leaders unwilling to sacrifice their sovereignty to the United States. The "opposition" movements which spring up in such countries are often composed of people whose hedonism has been successfully awakened, and who are thus enticed to grumble against their existing national order because of the lack of "fleshpots, leeks and onions and garlic." Thus they are led to grumble against regimes which were often quite successful at meeting the basic needs of their citizenry.
We can see the export of hedonism in the British empire, where Britain legalized and fought to protect the opium trade in China during the 1800's. We can see it now in Afghanistan, in that the growing of opium - forcibly ended by the Taliban prior to the U.S. invasion - is back in full swing, thanks to U.S. involvement. These are but two of the fruits of the foreign policy of nations which have at one time or another called themselves both "Christian" and "defenders of freedom." What they really meant, it seems, was the "freedom" to be made into addicts.
I think the export of hedonism by Anglo-American society deserves much more research, and even several well-informed blog posts providing further elaboration. However, I am fighting for my life right now in grad school. So if anyone else wants to take up the topic, please feel free. If you wish to write on the subject, I ask that your focus be on the role of the Anglo-American export of hedonism in the fomenting of revolutions and attempted regime change by the U.S. and its allies, focusing especially on the time from the beginning of the Cold War onward. Thanks, and have a good day.