Conversations between some people can seem a lot like beating a dead horse over and over again until the horse has been turned into equine hamburger. This is especially true when one party in the conversation is trying to communicate the truth, and the other party has made up his mind to refuse to understand that truth - presumably, because it's to the other party's advantage to not understand. As Upton Sinclair once wrote, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it." So it seems to be with many who are commenting on the influx of refugees from the Mideast and North Africa into Europe.
Most of these commenters have written at great length of the dangers of letting said refugees (dirty, uncouth and savage "invading hordes") into the pure, precious, civilized sanctuary that is supposed to be Europe. Indeed, such charity has been characterized as "committing suicide" (culturally, I presume) by at least one highly placed Eurasian politician. Granted, there are Europeans who - very, very grudgingly - acknowledge that maybe, just maybe it is a good and moral thing to give a little bit of sanctuary to the Arab and Mideastern refugees whose homelands Europe has recently helped to destroy. Yet many of these same Europeans object fervently to letting black Africans into their special precious sanctuary.
Well, okay, if that's the way you want to be, fine (although I am of African descent, and I am black!) But have you thought of asking why Black Africans might want to emigrate to Europe in the first place? If so, I have some ready answers to such a question. In an earlier post, I described how forced migrations of peoples result from the robbery and plunder of those peoples by a nation skilled at robbery which then concentrates the majority of the resources of nations within its own borders, leaving almost nothing for those nations which it has robbed. When we look at what European nations have done to Africa, there are plenty of examples of this process. I will name a few recent cases for you to chew on.
First, there is the case of Nigeria, where the peoples who inhabit the Niger delta have suffered for at least two decades from the petroleum extraction activities of rich multinational corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell. The pollution, not only from routine oil extraction, but also from lax operations and oil spills, has severely degraded living conditions in the Delta, and has seriously disrupted indigenous ways of life that were far less destructive to the land than the changes which the Europeans have brought. Not only this, but the leaders of the Nigerian government have been installed by European and American multinationals for the purpose of keeping oil extraction costs low and profits sky high, thus insuring that the ordinary people of Nigeria will not benefit from the exploitation of their nation's resources. Many of these ordinary Nigerians have risen up in opposition to this exploitation, and are now being branded as "terrorists" and "insurgents." (See this and this also.) As their homelands are wrecked in order to satisfy the European and American thirst for petroleum products, where will these people go?
The Nigerian oil situation is but a very small subset of the issue of the way Europe and the United States look at the African continent and the peoples who reside there. I am thinking particularly of recent articles I have read in the financial press, as well as press releases by various mining companies which all describe Africa as a "treasure trove" of various things wanted by Europe and the Anglo-American empire. There are also a number of interesting "players" in the African resource-extraction market, such as African Minerals, a mining company based in Sierra Leone, which was sued by villagers in that country for violently evicting those villagers from land wanted by the company, along with violent treatment of its workers, including a fatal shooting of a worker by police. The incidents took place from 2010 to 2012. The head of African Minerals, a Mr. Frank Timis, led his company into bankruptcy in 2015, and is now embroiled in a bitter legal dispute with investors. Mr. Timis, who possesses dual Romanian and Australian citizenship, was also convicted twice for dealing heroin.
Then there is the matter of coastal African nations and the peoples who make a living on those coasts by fishing. They have a long-standing problem, namely, that European fishing operations have depleted their coastal fisheries to the extent that the locals can no longer easily make a living. When the locals try to oppose the overfishing of their own resource because they can no longer make a living, they are branded as "pirates." (See this also.)
Lastly, there is the issue of land grabs, either by foreign multinationals or by the local government proxies installed by these multinationals. Take Ethiopia, for instance, whose government is taken from a minority of the population, yet which uses its power (financed in no small part by the United States) to expel members of the majority Oromo population from their lands in order to clear the way for "development." (See this, this and this.)
The instances I have mentioned are but a small scratch of a very large surface, beneath which lies a very large reservoir of wrongdoing. These things are the means by which life in Africa has become a painful burden for many Africans, and the motivation behind their desire to escape to places where they may live in peace and safety. Peace and safety - two things for which almost every human being longs. And yet, there are those in Europe, who after plundering and destroying other peoples' homelands for the sake of enriching their own, can't seem to understand why those other people would want to seek peace and safety in Europe. Those who regularly read my blog know that I seek to promote mutual hospitality and Christian charity of all peoples one toward another. I really mean that. Sharing, mutual exchange, and learning from one another ought to be encouraged as much as possible. However, if Europeans don't want to have to share their precious society with "invading hordes" whom they themselves have created, then let them get out of Africa (and other places!). Stop looking at other people's homelands as a "treasure trove" to be exploited for the use of pure, special Europeans. Stop stealing other peoples' stuff. It is that simple. (You can even stop looking at the deserts of North Africa as an untapped solar resource, as far as I'm concerned. I am sure you'd try to find a way to exploit that resource without paying the inhabitants of the lands you used.) Once you all start leaving other people alone, you'll be free to give up your Munchausen-false flag complaints about other people trying to overrun or "de-civilize" your pure society. Fortunately, Europe and the U.S. are currently being helped (albeit involuntarily) to give up their thievery by the current collapse in commodities markets. After a while, in most cases, crime really doesn't pay. In the long run, it never pays.