Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Apologies to Commenters
Here's a quick note of apology to a few commenters whose comments were made five months ago and which I did not post until a few weeks ago. I did not see the comments in Blogger until a few weeks ago. I think especially of Harry Lerwill's comment on "How to Digitally Fake a Video". Thanks much for your readership. Hopefully, I'll get a better handle on the in's and outs of Blogger. Stay tuned for another installment on American narcissism and where this country is headed.
Saturday, December 27, 2014
The Birth of a "Special" People
(Before you read this, you'd better take a bathroom break, then get yourself a cup of coffee. This post is long.)
Today it's time to delve the origins of American (specifically, Anglo-American) narcissism. To me, the most obvious place to start digging is Imperial Rome in the years from the birth of Christ through the reign of Constantine. Let's look first at the psychological construct of national exceptionalism, which has existed for as long as there have been nation-states. The pre-Christian, pre-Roman Greek state of Athens is an excellent example of this. (See this and this for examples). The Greek example shows one key characteristic of national exceptionalism: namely, that it is created, invoked and promulgated by the leaders of a nation-state when those leaders want to rouse their citizens to war and other inhumane acts against the members of differing nations and states.
The Roman empire was no exception in its claims to exceptional status, as described in a Huffington Post article on the concept of the "just war." In the name of its exceptionalism, Rome conquered many peoples who had previously considered themselves to be exceptional. It was this empire which occupied Palestine in the days of the earthly life of Christ, and which sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD. Both the Romans and the people they conquered viewed exceptionalism as a means to lay claim to an exceptional share of all the things normally valued by people in this earthly life. Yet this empire was also the birthplace of the Christian faith – an otherworldly construct, a commonwealth of strangers and pilgrims on the earth (Hebrews 11:13; 1 Peter 1:1; 2:11), citizens of a Kingdom not of this world (John 18:36). The citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven were called to live by values which are radically different from the values of this earthly life. The modeling of these values, moreover, was guaranteed to bring the citizens of God's Kingdom into direct conflict with the citizens of all earthly kingdoms (Luke 6:20-28; John 15:18-16:3). Thus from the death and resurrection of Christ until the beginning of the reign of Constantine the Great, becoming a Christian was not the thing to do if you wanted a comfortable, wealthy life on earth.
Constantine's reign brought some rather drastic changes to the Christian church, which had become very popular among the Roman underclass because of its message of hope to the poor of this world. In fact, the Faith had begun to exert a considerable amount of temporal influence, both economic and political. Thus Constantine found it expedient to legalize Christianity and to extend imperial protection to the Faith. In exchange, the Church began to abandon certain otherworldly values and to embrace and support the earthly, secular values of the Roman state. At the Council of Arles in 314, a number of prominent members of the early church declared that “to deny the State the right to go to war was to condemn it to extinction.” (Source: Constantinian Christianity by Yuri Koszarycz.). The council also declared “Concerning those who lay down their weapons in peacetime, be it resolved that they be excluded from fellowship.” (Source: The Canons to Sylvester from the Council of Arles). The Church abandoned the pacifism of the New Testament and began to legitimize the concept of a “just war.” Through the acts of Constantine, the first State church was born.
This State church was not the sum total of Christianity in the Roman Empire. There were many Christians who for various reasons did not choose to align themselves with the State church. Some of those reasons had to do with conscience, others to do with ambitions of the sort of earthly political and economic power which was now being enjoyed by the heads of the Roman State church. The abandonment of New Testament pacifism and the pursuit of earthly values by the State church and by some of its dissenters led inevitably to armed conflict. The funny thing about all this is that the combatants on each side claimed that God was on their side. Each side claimed a special mission from God which not only excused but vindicated their newly adopted violence and which vindicated their claim to whatever it was they were fighting for.
This should be no surprise, because if a group of people claim that they hold as holy the words of a certain Book, yet they are always refusing to obey certain key teachings of that Book in order to achieve earthly ends, they need to have some insanely awesome excuses for their refusal to obey. So national exceptionalism was retooled to provide the excuse, which now read something like this: “We have a special mission from God in these difficult and dangerous days. Therefore God calls us to fight and die on behalf of that mission. May God bless us in carrying out that mission!” The flip side of that exceptionalism was the demonization of those who were considered enemies of the exceptional State. This silenced the conscience of combatants and legitimized the horrible things they did to the soldiers and civilians who were the target of their warfare.
State churches and ecclesiastically sanctioned violence marked each of the nations who fought in the religious wars which dot the landscape of European history, including the Crusades, the Eighty Years' War, and the Cromwellian conquest of England, to name a few. Each of the combatant nations believed in its own exceptionalism, and each had its clerics who told its citizens how exceptional their cause was, and how this was due to the mission which they had “received from God.” This exceptionalism naturally led the citizens of each belligerent nation to believe that it and its citizens were superior to other nations.
This exceptionalism and superiority got a turbocharge boost in the 16th century through the writings of John Calvin. Calvin was an influential French politician, preacher and theologian who devised a number of Church doctrines which had a profound influence on the culture of England and the United States. A key doctrine of Calvin is the doctrine of predestination. He believed that certain Bible passages taught that God has predestined some people to find salvation through faith in Christ, and that He has predestined others to eternal punishment. He also taught that this predestination has occurred independently of any man's choice in the matter. This was a special case of Calvin's doctrine concerning the sovereignty of God, where he wrote that all that happens in the world is the expression of Divinely permitted and approved Providence. Naturally, since most people in Calvin's audiences wanted to go to Heaven and not Hell, they became very curious about how they might know they were of the elect whom God had chosen for salvation.
A number of sources (including Max Weber) therefore state that Calvinists looked to “success in earthly calling” as a sign of God's election – i.e., material success in one's work. This was combined with the imposition of a duty on hearers to be as successful as possible (in contrast with 1 Timothy 6:9-10, in which St. Paul warns people against wanting to be rich). Naturally, those who were successful in business liked this doctrine, since it allowed them to look down on those whose lives were marked by material struggles, because such strugglers obviously did not have the blessing of God. (An interesting side note: the Church had also historically taught that usury – the lending of money at interest – was wrong and forbidden by Scripture. But Calvin stated that some Scriptures which had seemed to forbid usury had been misinterpreted, and other Scriptures no longer applied because times had changed. (Source: "Usury and Capitalism" from the Wikipedia article on John Calvin.)
This, then, was the flavor of the nationalist exceptionalism which pervaded many European societies just prior to the colonization of the United States: first, a belief that God had endowed certain nations with a mission that condoned armed conflict in support of that mission; secondly, a belief that God had predestined certain people to eternal salvation and others to eternal damnation independent of the choice of these people, and third, a belief that material success combined with hard work was a sign of God's blessing upon the elect, and that lack of material success was a sign of the opposite.
The American colonists therefore were already primed for exceptionalism when they arrived in the New World. They preached that theirs was an exceptional mission: to found a new Israel in the New World (for instance, see John Winthrop, Cotton Mather, Thomas Thacher, and Thomas Prince). Later, they preached that it was the manifest destiny of the United States to conquer the entire North American continent (see John L. O'Sullivan). This they did – and along the way, nearly exterminated the Native American peoples who had been here previously, through both overt warfare, trickery and ecological warfare (namely, the near-extermination of the buffalo). In their efforts to expand White American wealth and power, they also involuntarily “recruited” millions of dark-skinned, formerly free Africans from their homelands to assist in the expansion of White American wealth. The wealthiest of these settlers just “knew” that they were exceptional because their Calvinism had told them so. The exceptionalism of the people of the United States also gave rise to an exceptional new religion, namely Mormonism, which, in addition to being occult and arcane, is one of the most racist elitist religions on earth.
The wealthy among the new settlers used the arguments of Calvinism to justify their treatment of the dark-skinned peoples they exploited and killed, claiming that the fact that Providence had allowed the conquest of the North American continent, that conquest must necessarily have been God's manifest will. In addition, these wealthy people compared their standard of material wealth to the stark material simplicity of many Native Americans and Africans and concluded that because God had not “blessed” them, these nonwhite people could not be of the elect; therefore, they could do whatever they wanted to them. The Golden Rule did not apply to the treatment of nonwhite people. (To use clinical language, dark-skinned peoples became “objects” to be exploited.)
In the later decades of the 19th century, the American religious community came into conflict with the spread of the writings of Charles Darwin. Yet in some circles there was a truce, and certain men discovered that it was advantageous to combine allegedly Darwinian concepts with the notion of Divine predestination of certain peoples to blessing and election of others to curses. Among these men were Josiah Strong, a Congregational preacher who in 1891 wrote, “Can anyone doubt that the result of this competition of races will be the survival of the fittest?”, and who lamented two years later that the superior Anglo-Saxon stock of the United States was deteriorating because of immigration. (Baynton, 2014) The late 1800's and early 1900's also saw the development of “muscular Christianity” in Anglo-Saxon society as a response to the perceived threat posed by non Anglo-Saxon peoples. (This “muscular Christianity” influenced the development of the YMCA and of American professional football, by the way. For more information, see this.) These trains of thought also gave rise to the pseudoscience of eugenics, which argued that some people were endowed with specialness by nature in the same way that Calvinism had argued that some people were pre-selected by God for blessing – and which also argued that some people were cursed by nature in the same way that Calvinism claimed that these were also cursed by God. The rationalism of eugenics led to human attempts to improve the human breed, leading in turn to forced sterilizations of people deemed “unfit” by several states in the U.S. (Another side note: the British government is currently funding forced sterilizations of poor people in India, according to an article published in the Guardian in 2012, and other sources.)
The combination of religious superiority (Calvinism), the record of “Providence” (manifest destiny, social Calvinism, and a long string of seemingly unbroken successes), and botched science (social Darwinism, eugenics) has proven to be an intoxicating mix. This country has been drinking one version or another of that mix for over 200 years. This mixture is the myth taught to generations of American schoolchildren, advertised to generations of American consumers, and preached to generations of American ears in every context from movie theaters to books to political campaigns to church pulpits. (Read The Light and the Glory by Peter Marshall, for an example of this.) This is the foundation of American narcissism, the belief that this nation is above all nations in that it has a special mission from God (a mission which conveniently lines up with American imperial ambitions), that Americans (specifically, white Americans) are a special, chosen people, and the belief that both Scripture, Providence and nature bear this out.
This belief in our “specialness” is so pervasive and has been taught for so long that it has become the unconscious foundation of the lives of most Americans, most of whom can no longer articulate the roots of their specialness. They are special just 'cause they are. I think of K. Anders Ericsson, who wrote that it takes 10,000 hours of deliberate practice in order to achieve expert performance in an endeavor. The average American has had many more than 10,000 hours of being schooled to think that he or she is “special” – a special member of a special people and a special nation. From this “specialness” has arisen a belief among many Americans that each one is more “special” than anyone else, including his or her fellow Americans. A recent paper titled, “The Cracked Mirror: Features of Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Children,” expounds the process of the formation of this belief. The author, Karen Kernberg Bardenstein, identified risk factors for the development of clinical narcissism in children. Among these are being the child of narcissistic parents, the child of successful parents, and the overindulged or wealthy child. Consider the vast disparity between what has become “the American way of life” and the standard of material wealth enjoyed by most of the world's population. Is it any wonder that this nation as a whole has the character of someone with a personality disorder? Other factors which contribute to the competing claims for specialness among Americans include the unhealthy glorification of competition – both economic, scholastic, and athletic. If you spend 10,000 hours in concentrated instruction, you can turn just about anyone into an entitled, selfish, first-class jerk.
We now openly compete for stages from which each of us can proclaim his or her own specialness. Think of reality TV, American Idol, and all the shows which were spawned by American Idol. I think of a recent example of “specialness,” the “balloon boy” Falcon Heene whose parents Richard and Mayumi Heene caused national panic in 2009 when they called 911 claiming that their son Falcon had been carried away by a weather balloon. It turned out that the claim was false; the boy had been hiding in the attic of his home all the time that rescuers were looking for him. It was revealed that his parents had pulled a hoax in order to get their family on reality TV (they had already been on TV once before). His parents therefore did a bit of jail time for their trouble. A few years later, Mr. Heene was able to get himself back in the media spotlight as reporters followed up on the “balloon boy,” who is now an aspiring pre-adolescent metal rock guitarist and front man for the Heene Boyz band. Maybe the publicity has helped Falcon's career.
Later, the American evangelical world produced a religious “balloon boy”: Colton Burpo, whose parents claimed that when Colton was three years old, during an emergency appendectomy, he died and went to Heaven, then came back so he could tell his parents about the journey. Colton's story was “Providentially” discovered by Thomas Nelson Publishers who published Colton's story in the book Heaven is for Real, in 2010. Afterward, the book was “Providentially” discovered by Sony Pictures and made into a movie which was released this year, 2014. Now, I can't prove or disprove another person's religious experience. But I can't swallow Colton Burpo. Luke 16:27-31 is one big reason why. Another reason is that the whole affair smells like stage-managed narcissism to me. Colton's father pastors his own church, and he and his wife have also revealed that Colton is now a high school wrestling star and an accomplished musician who has toured with the band Read You And Me. (If you have the stomach for it, you can watch some YouTube videos of Colton singing and performing. I don't have the stomach for it.) What better opportunity for Todd Burpo to grow his own church and to start a career in Christian media for his son than a near-death experience?
And while we are talking about movies, let me mention the final frontier of hubris, namely, The Interview, a Sony Pictures semi-comedy about two journalists who are recruited by the CIA to assassinate the head of the government of North Korea. The movie is the incarnation of the idea of America as a special nation with a special mission that can be carried out by ordinary Americans who will succeed just because they are Americans, and as we all know, Americans are all just so crazy awesome! The publicity surrounding the movie is the embodiment of American hubris, because when the plot of the movie was announced, many American politicians brushed aside North Korean objections, claiming that these objections were the attempts of a dictator regime to stifle American First Amendment freedoms. (Whoa, dude! You mean to tell me that you can make a movie about threatening to kill someone in another country and the person you threaten can't protest because it would infringe on your First Amendment rights? We are truly a “special” nation.) The movie and its publicity are also an example of what I call “desperate narcissism,” because in the days prior to the movie's release the Obama administration claimed that North Korea had hacked Sony's computer network, and Obama himself promised retaliation. Yet a number of prominent cyber security experts expressed public doubt that North Korea had done such a thing. Sony claimed that it was considering not releasing the Interview in order not to provoke international tensions, but Obama and other politicians pushed back, saying, “We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship here in the United States.” So this Christmas the movie opened in flag-draped theaters packed full of doofuses and raked in quite a bit of dough in the process. Can anybody say “publicity stunt” with me?
Desperate narcissism. To a narcissist, good attention is the best thing a body can have. But even negative attention is better than no attention. When narcissists are denied attention they get desperate. I'll talk more about the desperate phase of American narcissism in a future post.
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Uncle Sam On The Couch
In my last post, I described an educational clinic located in a poorer part of a large American city. I described the healthy cooperation between the tutors in the clinic and the children who are being tutored, and the contrast between these kids – all of them from low income families, and many of them immigrants – and many Americans. I want to elaborate on that contrast. Therefore, today's post will not be directly about post-Peak education.
I have described these kids as “technicals”, comparing them to the small, nearly indestructible trucks used by some governments and most separatists in developing countries. Just like the trucks, these kids are tough, simple (but not stupid), and easy to fix. Their toughness and simplicity both arise from the fact that they are not full of their own self-importance, but they know that they have to share the world with others, and that this sharing involves saying “Please” and “Thank you” and waiting their turn for things. I contrasted them with Americans (and many other native-born citizens of the First World) by comparing the “First-Worlders” to BMW's, which are called “the ultimate driving machines,” but which are complicated, expensive to own and fix, and which need constant pampering. It can easily be argued that a person who is complicated, expensive to maintain, and in need of constant pampering is probably affected by a personality disorder. I submit to you that America's public face – the face put forward in American mainstream media, the face worn by the wealthiest Americans and the politicians they own, the face worn by many, even among the poor, who sympathize with the wealthy of this country – is the face of someone with a personality disorder. Being personality-disordered has consequences, both for our interpersonal relations and the relations between this country and nations and peoples external to it.
In discussing personality disorders, I will be referring to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, of the American Psychiatric Association (APA). The manual is commonly referred to as the DSM-IV. (The APA has published a new edition, the DSM-V, but I think it waters down some key diagnostic points which are pertinent to this post.) According to the DSM-IV, a personality disorder is “an enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectation of the individual's culture, is pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment.” According to Joanna Ashmun, a personality disorder is “a pattern of deviant or abnormal behavior that the person doesn't change even though it causes...trouble with other people...”
What are the marks of America's personality disorder? The DSM-IV describes a disorder characterized by “a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy...and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
- ...a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
- is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
- believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
- requires excessive admiration
- has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
- is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
- lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings or needs of others
- is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
- shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes."
Over the last decade or two, most who have written about NPD have written of the manifestation and effects of narcissism in interpersonal relationships, especially relationships of romance and family. These writers have been like most writers of poetry and songs in Western pop culture who have devoted the majority of their efforts to writing about the ins, outs, ups and downs of romantic love. Yet it should come as no surprise that the techniques needed to write a good love song can be applied with equal skill to writing a good song about almost anything else. In the same way, a great deal can be learned by studying the ways in which clinical narcissism can affect and motivate not only family dynamics, but the culture and policies of nations.
Therefore the next one or two posts will explore the origins of the narcissistic American national identity, and the way this identity has guided American foreign policy, the treatment of marginalized groups within this country's borders, and this country's response to limits – both its own human limits and the limits to growth imposed by resource constraints. I'll also make a few guesses regarding likely responses of this country to upcoming challenges, and what those responses will mean to its citizens. In attempting to describe the public American persona, I must say that there are many Americans – people from every national and ethnic background – who don't act like they're personality-disordered. However, theirs are not the dominant voices in America nowadays. Also, in laying out a roadmap for my next few posts, I am sure that I've given away enough to enable someone else to beat me to the punch with posts of their own on the same subject. Go for it, if you feel so led.
One last thing. My assessment will not be patriotic or supportive of the current wars this country is fighting. Therefore, what I say may cause a few readers to spew coffee on their keyboards. You've been warned.
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
A Clinic At The Meeting Place Of Nations
The Meeting Place: The meeting place of nations is now not very far from most Americans. It can be found in most large cities, especially those located on the east and west coasts. There one will find immigrant populations from many nations, many of whom are arriving in the United States with very few material possessions. The narrow-minded among us blame these immigrants for their poverty. But the truth is that many immigrants are coming here because the things that were valuable to them in their homelands – land, freedom, self-determination, and natural resources – are being taken from them by American corporations and American military might in order to maintain a lavish lifestyle for privileged Americans. In their poverty, these immigrant populations are being joined by an increasing number of Americans who have recently been forced out of their privileged positions by people higher up on the ladder of privilege. Poverty is a great integrator.
The Clinic: Over the last year, I became acquainted with some people who like practicing charity. Some might view their passion as a hobby. They are, after all, as passionate about it as other people are about model trains, snowboarding, or restoring classic cars. They, however, look at it as doing what their Boss has commanded.
Their latest charity is something they're doing with their church. Over a year ago, the church encountered a family who live in an apartment complex in one of the low-income parts of the city where the church is located. In the process of befriending this family, the members discovered that the children of this family were not being well served by the school district in which they live. Those who live in the city where this church is located would not be surprised at this fact, in light of the general failure of the city's public school system to educate children of color and immigrants from developing countries. The educational plight of the children of this particular family motivated some of the members of the church to form a team to visit the apartment complex on a weekly basis for scholastic tutoring sessions.
The team uses various on-line free educational resources in their efforts. Most of these resources consist of public-domain PDF books that can be freely copied and distributed. Many of these e-books were created by volunteers associated with Copian (formerly the National Adult Literacy Database), a non-profit agency which was directly funded by the Canadian Government until June of this year. (As an aside, Copian was a truly remarkable group of people, whose members wrote a large number of free math, reading and ESL, and parenting books for immigrants and aboriginal populations in Canada. As I said, they were de-funded this year. And I think the reason they were de-funded is that first, what they were offering for free was really valuable. This was probably perceived as a threat to the potential profits of some rich capitalist. Second, I think that the powers that be may have seen Copian as being a little too successful in lifting marginalized populations through access to education. I think that neoliberal greed from south of the border has now contaminated Canada. Just my suspicion, I suppose. But I digress.)
The Clinicians: They are an interesting lot. The pastor of the church is one of the tutors, and he is well-qualified to teach, not only because he has a master's degree in Divinity, but because he is also a math nerd who likes building his own computers. His cohorts include two people with degrees in technical fields who work in technical design, and one college professor. Yet these are not typical pocket-protector types; one of them freely admits that hanging out with kids is a refreshing change from being stuck with grown-ups all day.
This team has created an educational clinic – a clinic at the meeting place of nations. Their clients consist of children from Asia, Mexico, the African continent, and the United States. The clinic is self-selecting, in the sense that while the clinicians are willing to take anyone who walks in the door, those people who can't stand to be with people who are different from them are not likely to walk in. Thus the clients tend to be more pleasant to work with than many Americans.
The Clients: They truly do seem to be special people. Special in the way that many kids are special: endearingly goofy even when they are not trying to be. Special because they don't “know” that they're special – in other words, they are not constantly full of their own self-importance. Special because, not being full of themselves, they have an accurate understanding of their place in the world, and of the fact that they must share the world with everyone else, and that this sharing involves saying “Please,” and “Thank you,” and waiting one's turn for things. Special in that they spontaneously share things with each other. Special in that they're “easy to fix.”
To illustrate this last point, let me use a metaphor. These kids are “technicals” – that is, tough, simple (but not stupid!), and easy to diagnose. And when they're angry or unhappy, it's possible to quickly get to the root of their problem and provide a solution. In contrast, many upwardly mobile people in this country (along with many who want to pretend to be upwardly mobile) are like a BMW. BMW's are supposed to be the “ultimate driving machine,” yet they are almost never seen in places where they're not likely to be pampered – places like the back roads of a developing country, for instance – because they are complicated and expensive to fix and maintain, as are many Americans and other native-born First World citizens.
These kids are easy to motivate if you offer them munchies as a reward for a night of working hard at learning. (But give 'em something healthy! Not Cheetos and Takis!) The tutors have connected strongly with them. Tutors and students have coalesced into a motivated team. They have also become an example of the sort of arrangements ordinary citizens will have to make in an age of disappearing social safety nets and continued cuts in government services – cuts made by free-market capitalists who have captured governments in order to cannibalize the citizens who are supposed to be served by those governments. When the “government” no longer provides any services except the supply of uniformed men to commit violence in the name of the “government,” the real job of governing falls on ordinary citizens. Those who serve their fellow human beings become the new “government.”
Thursday, December 11, 2014
What "Boycott" Means To Me
Sometimes it's very easy to start a fire, and sometimes it's very hard. It can also be hard to channel fire to useful purposes, and sometimes it's hard to know whether your efforts to do so are succeeding.
The #blackoutblackfriday boycott, however, seems to have lit a fire, and it seems to be succeeding. To me, one evidence of success is the fact that retail sales on Black Friday this year were down 11 percent from last year. The explanations offered by the pundits for this drop all omit the economic boycott of major retailers by Black Americans who are tired of being harassed by people in this country who want to turn the clock back on human rights. Because the pundits don't take this into account, their explanations sound rather lame.
Now it seems that my call to extend the boycott through the entire holiday season is catching fire. A number of other websites are echoing the call. However, I think some folks may be confused over the meaning of the word "boycott." I think of one site which urges its followers to do the following:
And what about entertainment? Of course, we should not consume "light" entertainment this season. But what could possibly be wrong with Hunger Games - except that the story told in Hunger Games is already being played out in real life in the Greatest Country On Earth, and we don't need a movie to get the point. That, and one very significant difference between the book and the movie. (For another example of the same thing, see this.) And what about the Book of Exodus? It contains a great deal of social commentary, but why should I support the Hollywood dream-maker machine by watching that movie? Just about every drama in the theater nowadays can claim to "have social commentary as its subject matter." Yet they all share the same characteristic: they continue to portray one group of people, and one group only, as genuinely human, while all the other peoples of the earth are either ignored or caricatured. To go to the movies at all right now is to continue to support Hollywood in its efforts to provide the privileged members of a dysfunctional nation with narcissistic supply for a little while longer.
Meanwhile, in real life, Syrians are being bombed for the "crime" of simply wanting to exist as a people separate from the control of the United States. This is the same "crime" that was committed by the Iraqis, the Libyans, the Afghans, the people of Ukraine, the people of Vietnam, the Native Americans, and others too numerous to mention. And in the United States, people of color are still being targeted and framed by police for crimes they did not commit. "Conscious consumerism" won't stop these things from happening. The only thing that will is to starve the beast. I don't feel like watching a movie. I'm not spending any money for the holidays. Not one dime!
The #blackoutblackfriday boycott, however, seems to have lit a fire, and it seems to be succeeding. To me, one evidence of success is the fact that retail sales on Black Friday this year were down 11 percent from last year. The explanations offered by the pundits for this drop all omit the economic boycott of major retailers by Black Americans who are tired of being harassed by people in this country who want to turn the clock back on human rights. Because the pundits don't take this into account, their explanations sound rather lame.
Now it seems that my call to extend the boycott through the entire holiday season is catching fire. A number of other websites are echoing the call. However, I think some folks may be confused over the meaning of the word "boycott." I think of one site which urges its followers to do the following:
"Purchase ONLY necessities during the holiday buying season. "Necessities" include:
- Day-to-day items needed for grooming and hygiene
- Gasoline
- Food that can be cooked or prepped at home
- Electronic devices vital to businesses and personal communication.
"Boycott the purchase of non-essential, high price retail items. These include: ...Entertainment, unless the entertainment has to do with justice (e.g. - has a social commentary as its subject matter. Hunger Games, yes. Horrible Bosses 2, no."I say "Amen" to limiting purchases solely to "necessities." But what is "necessary"? Personal grooming items like soap and toothpaste, yes. Gasoline, yes. Food that can be prepared at home (raw meat, uncooked beans, rice, vegetables, etc.), yes. But electronic devices?? Let's see...to the owner of the aforementioned site, do you see the potential for watering down your proposed "boycott"?
And what about entertainment? Of course, we should not consume "light" entertainment this season. But what could possibly be wrong with Hunger Games - except that the story told in Hunger Games is already being played out in real life in the Greatest Country On Earth, and we don't need a movie to get the point. That, and one very significant difference between the book and the movie. (For another example of the same thing, see this.) And what about the Book of Exodus? It contains a great deal of social commentary, but why should I support the Hollywood dream-maker machine by watching that movie? Just about every drama in the theater nowadays can claim to "have social commentary as its subject matter." Yet they all share the same characteristic: they continue to portray one group of people, and one group only, as genuinely human, while all the other peoples of the earth are either ignored or caricatured. To go to the movies at all right now is to continue to support Hollywood in its efforts to provide the privileged members of a dysfunctional nation with narcissistic supply for a little while longer.
Meanwhile, in real life, Syrians are being bombed for the "crime" of simply wanting to exist as a people separate from the control of the United States. This is the same "crime" that was committed by the Iraqis, the Libyans, the Afghans, the people of Ukraine, the people of Vietnam, the Native Americans, and others too numerous to mention. And in the United States, people of color are still being targeted and framed by police for crimes they did not commit. "Conscious consumerism" won't stop these things from happening. The only thing that will is to starve the beast. I don't feel like watching a movie. I'm not spending any money for the holidays. Not one dime!
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Blackout the Year End - An Update
I have started a new blog, which will run from now until the end of the year. This blog deals specifically with unjust police violence and murder of people of color in the United States. The name of the blog is Black Out The Year End, and the address is Black Out The Year End.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Blackout the Year End
Here's a condensed and simple version of yesterday's post:
In memory of Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager who was shot to death by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, and in honor of all the other people of color who were shot to death without cause by police in 2014, please do the following:
In memory of Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager who was shot to death by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, and in honor of all the other people of color who were shot to death without cause by police in 2014, please do the following:
- Pray for the United States of America, that God would chasten and correct this country for its murder.
- Please don't buy anything other than food this holiday season. Please also avoid all movies and other paid entertainment.
- Spread the word!
Friday, November 28, 2014
A Holiday Season Boycott
In
his book, The Great Divorce, C.S. Lewis stated that it is
impossible to remedy the fact that one is going in the wrong
direction by continuing in the same direction. Repentance consists
of turning around and retracing one's steps in order to travel in the
right direction.
The
United States, a nation founded on oppression and bloodshed from its
very beginnings, finally began to come to its senses during the
1960's and 1970's, as a result of massive protests against violations
of the civil rights of its oppressed classes, both at home and
abroad. But almost from the moment the ink began to dry on the Civil
Rights Acts of the 1960's, the holders of concentrated economic and
political power and privilege in this country began plotting to tear
apart the civil rights gains that were achieved. They began plotting
to reverse the U-turn which American society had begun to make. They
began plotting during a time of plenty for the nation as a whole, a
high point of resource availability and economic power, thus giving
the lie to the notion that societies become fascist and oppressive
only during times of leanness and economic contraction. They plotted
thus and have continued to plot and to act on their plots over a
period of more than five decades, thus showing the pathology of their
plotting minds.
This
week it looks like these plotters have won – among whom are Ronald
Reagan, Dick Cheney, the Bush family, Rupert Murdoch, Charles and
David Koch, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, Rudy Giuliani, Charles Butt
(son of Howard E. Butt, the owner of a large supermarket chain) and a
whole host of fellow-traveler multimillionaires and billionaires. And
the Republican Party is a revived, rampaging beast, seeking to
dominate the world in the name of a hypocrisy masquerading as a
theocracy. But all hope is not lost. In a post
I made last week, my last prediction regarding events in Ferguson,
Missouri is that I expected many disenfranchised people in this
country to become quite creative in the art of passive rebellion.
And
that is just what is happening. Many, not only African-Americans but
others as well, sick to death of being oppressed by narcissistic,
sociopathic supremacists, have decided to strike
back in a way that is both non-violent and perfectly
street-legal. Today, many of us are celebrating Blackout Black
Friday, a day in which we are boycotting all the sales at retail
outlets trying to move commercial trash. Many of us have pledged
that we will not spend one dime today. (Disclosure: I am at
Starbucks typing this. But that's because over two years ago, I
swore off paid Internet service. Once I'm done here, I'm done
spending money.)
I
hope Blackout Black Friday is a roaring success. However, I think we
should extend our boycott to the entire holiday season. And here's
what I mean. I know we all need groceries. But let's swear off
buying anything other that what is needed for everyday life. Let's
forgo buying toys of any kind, whether toys for kids or toys for
grown-ups. If your TV breaks between now and New Years, take it as a
sign that you should give up watching TV. If your computer breaks
between now and New Years, find a used computer or borrow someone
else's. If the phone you have now still makes phone calls, don't
upgrade it. Trust me, you don't need more consumer electronics. Let
those who still drink the Kool-Aid of supremacy take on the burden of
trying to save this shopping season. Let's see what happens when
they max out their credit cards.
If
such a boycott really takes off, expect whining multimillionaires to
dominate the airwaves complaining about how we're “hurting the
economy” and “depriving people of holiday celebrations.” I
have an answer for that also. If you still feel the need to give
gifts to people this season, then give food to the hungry. Extend
hospitality to the widows, the orphans and the strangers –
especially the dark-skinned strangers from foreign countries who have
come here because economic and military policies of the United States
jacked up their former homelands. A hot meal is always in season.
In
short, let's have a holiday season devoid of materialism. For those
who are Christians, let us return to a pure celebration of the birth
of Christ, and let us remember His concern for the oppressed, laid
out in Matthew 25:31-46. For those who are Jewish, remember the God
who commands His people to care for the orphan, the widow and the
stranger; and remember that God is not a “respecter of persons.”
For those who are not religious, remember that you are connected to
your fellow man, and that “an injustice against one is an injustice
against all.” Take time this season to reconnect with your fellow
human beings.
A
good place to boycott is Wal-Mart, where John Crawford was shot
to death by police in Ohio in August for buying a toy pellet gun for
his children. Some good toys to boycott include pellet guns from any
and all manufacturers because of the shooting
of 12 year old Tamir Rice by Cleveland police while he was playing
with a pellet gun in a public park. (Here
is a list of more shootings that have taken place since Michael Brown
was shot to death.) A good company to boycott is Emerson Electric,
which is headquartered in Ferguson, Missouri, and which manufactures
appliances and tools under the ClosetMaid, InSinkErator, Metro, ProTeam,
RIDGID, and WORKSHOP brands. Some good entertainment to boycott
includes all sports events (including all bowl games), all celebrity
shows, all movies, and any other entertainment designed to distract
us from the horrible injustice we are seeing in the “greatest
nation on earth.”
One other thing. We now know that the picture circulated on conservative media of police officer Darren Wilson sustaining injuries from his encounter with Michael Brown was a fake. (See http://www.snopes.com/info/news/wilson.asp)
One other thing. We now know that the picture circulated on conservative media of police officer Darren Wilson sustaining injuries from his encounter with Michael Brown was a fake. (See http://www.snopes.com/info/news/wilson.asp)
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Michael Brown as a Rorschach Test
Well,
it looks like my powers of prediction regarding Michael Brown were
pretty good so far. (This doesn't make me very happy.) Then again,
it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see how things would go. But
what has been interesting to me (in an unpleasant way) is the
discussions of the verdict and its aftermath, both on-line and in
person, in which I have been involved this week.
First,
there is a widely spread rumor that has been accepted as Gospel
truth, that Michael Brown was stopped by Darren Wilson after robbing
a convenience store. For those who believe this, allow me to point
out the following facts:
- Michael Brown was not stopped by Officer Wilson for being a suspect in a convenience store robbery. At the time Brown was stopped, Wilson did not know of the alleged robbery of the convenience store which Brown is accused of robbing. (Source: http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/15/ferguson-chief-officer-didnt-know-about-robbery/14124259/)
- The video which purports to show Brown robbing the store is of such poor quality that no faces can be recognized in it. (Source: http://thewellrundry.blogspot.com/2014/08/how-to-digitally-fake-video-or-they.html)
- The employees of the store allegedly robbed by Brown have admitted that they made no 911 calls regarding a robbery on the day that Brown was shot. (Source: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/08/18/1322560/-Ferguson-Store-Owner-Says-NO-ONE-From-His-Store-Called-Cops-To-Report-Cigar-Theft)
- Michael Brown had no criminal record on the day he was shot. (Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/14/michael-brown-no-record/14041457/)
Lastly, no cigars were found on Michael Brown's body or on the ground next to him after he was shot dead.
But one interesting element in all these facts is that either they have been buried under a flood of right-wing propaganda and scapegoating, or that many people don't want to hear them in the first place. When people only see what they want to see, it's always a sign of an underlying issue of character or personality. So allow me to suggest that Michael Brown has become something of a Rorschach test for the American public. In this, he is like Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, ISIS, and Vietnam, except that what happened to him hits a lot closer to home. If the Rorschach test is supposed to differentiate between sanity and insanity, then the United States has been badly failing over most of its history. And times are coming – in fact, they are already here – in which we'll need all the sane people we can muster, because of the consequences of a failure of sanity among many members of the general public, who continue to believe that we can continue to scapegoat those who are crushed by the cowboy conquistadores of this country in their search for a little more Lebensraum.
But one interesting element in all these facts is that either they have been buried under a flood of right-wing propaganda and scapegoating, or that many people don't want to hear them in the first place. When people only see what they want to see, it's always a sign of an underlying issue of character or personality. So allow me to suggest that Michael Brown has become something of a Rorschach test for the American public. In this, he is like Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, ISIS, and Vietnam, except that what happened to him hits a lot closer to home. If the Rorschach test is supposed to differentiate between sanity and insanity, then the United States has been badly failing over most of its history. And times are coming – in fact, they are already here – in which we'll need all the sane people we can muster, because of the consequences of a failure of sanity among many members of the general public, who continue to believe that we can continue to scapegoat those who are crushed by the cowboy conquistadores of this country in their search for a little more Lebensraum.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
The High Cost of Living Room
Many
people in the United States are anxiously awaiting the announcement
of the grand jury verdict in the case of the shooting death of
Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, by Ferguson Police officer
Darren Wilson. It's interesting that several weeks ago, U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder resigned from President Obama's cabinet.
And it's also interesting that a number of law enforcement agencies
are “preparing for the worst”: to wit, the Department of Homeland
Security, the Missouri National Guard, and the U.S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation, among others.
This
leads me to make a prediction. First, I expect the grand jury to
refuse to indict Officer Wilson. Secondly, I expect that the
authorities, from Missouri Governor Jay Nixon downward, along with
President Obama, to have known all along that this is how the verdict
would turn out. Third, I do not expect the U.S. Department of
Justice to prosecute Officer Wilson or the Ferguson police
department. Fourth, I expect protests to result from these things.
But while the protests will be largely peaceful, the response of
those who hold power will be anything but peaceful. Thus the rest of
the world will get to see a fresh display of the hypocrisy United
States, which is busy bombing and killing other nations in their
quest to bring “democracy” and “human rights” to those
nations.
Fifth,
I expect a flood of right-wing commentary from the blogosphere, as
well as some rather surprisingly right-wing comments from people who
brand themselves as “left of center.” The commentary will seek
to justify what is in actuality a campaign of oppression and
extermination designed to grant a little extra “living room” (in
German, Lebensraum) to the largely white ruling classes in the United
States at this late hour of their existence. Some of the commentary
is likely to come from people who willfully ignore the history of
their own forbears who endured the cruelty of nations looking for
Lebensraum in the last world war.
Lastly,
I expect many disenfranchised people in this country to become quite
creative in the art of passive rebellion.
I
pray that I may be proved wrong about predictions #1 through #3.
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Why I don't Entirely Believe In The ISIS Crisis
ISIS
has been in the news a lot lately. I don't have a lot of time to
search out links, but I will give a summary of my impression of the
news. According to American media, ISIS has grown from a smattering
of formerly American-funded and American-trained Islamic militants
into a powerhouse of radical terrorist jihadism threatening to
destabilize the entire Middle East. Not only that, but they are
behind the barbarous beheadings of a number of foreign journalists
who were unwise enough to be caught hanging out in places where they
should not have been. And to top it all off, several ISIS plots have
been uncovered recently to attack public targets in the United
States, Australia and France.
In
response to all of these things, President Barack Obama has declared
a war to the finish against ISIS. (Never mind that we attacked ISIS
first, thus prompting the first beheading of a foreign journalist.)
So far, this has involved American and British airstrikes against
targets in Syria and Iraq. Some members of the U.S. government have
also talked of the need to initiate a ground campaign in the Mideast
in order to eradicate ISIS.
That's
my impression of the official story line, anyway. Now, I am not a
national security analyst, but a few things smell quite fishy about
the official story line. They have to do with how the U.S. and
Britain are using the ISIS crisis (hey, that rhymes!) to accomplish a
few policy objectives which they have long wanted to achieve, but
which have to date been stymied. First is the overthrow of the
Syrian government and its replacement by a puppet government
constructed by the United States, which tried for many months to find
a pretext for military operations against President Hassad, and which
failed to motivate enough Americans to back such a stinky business.
First, we tried to foment a fake revolution. Then we carried out a
number of false flag operations. Then certain highly placed
government officials told outright lies to a bunch of “news”
outlets unworthy of the title of journalists. Now ISIS provides a
convenient excuse to do something which was never legitimate in the
first place.
So
what about those beheadings? Well, all I know for sure is that they
were carried out by a bunch of guys in Arab costumes with masks on
their faces and speaking in funny accents. No sane or reasonable
person would venture to try to identify any of those masked men by
name – or by nationality. In the absence of more
substantive identification, I feel the same way I felt after watching
a grainy, low-resolution video broadcast by some mainstream media
outlets purporting to prove that someone who looked like Michael
Brown held up a convenience store before he was shot to death by a
white cop while unarmed. Pardon me, but I need to see faces that I
can recognize before I will even begin to consider any video
“evidence.” Who knows, the beheaders might be my next door
neighbors in Halloween costumes.
Compare
the Anglo-American portrayal of ISIS to the portrayal of Osama bin
Laden and al-Qaeda, and you'll notice a striking number of
similarities. Bin Laden served for years as America's bogeyman in
order to legitimize two stupid wars, huge losses of life, oppression
of two nations (three if you count the progress that has been made in
turning the U.S. into a police state), and untold damage. Osama was
America's Goldstein
from 2001 until his untimely death at the tusks of a bunch of trained
seals in 2011. I guess it was time for a new bogeyman, a new
La_Llorona to
keep us properly scared, compliant and willing to support our raging,
uncontrollable addiction to war. Thanks, ISIS!
Oh,
and one other thing. ISIS is being used to help us conveniently
forget our own self-inflicted problems, such as the oppression of
people of color by holders of white privilege in this country, the
continued oppression of women by dominating, narcissistic men who
legitimize domestic violence and rape, the oppression of sick people
by a predatory system of “insurance”, “medicine” and Big
Pharma, the environmental consequences we are now suffering due to
the non-negotiable American way of life, the predation of the poor by
the rich, etc, etc.
Sunday, August 31, 2014
Strung Out On Anodyne
The
United States is a selectively forgetful nation, thanks to the
mainstream media in this country. We are trained to remember
everything that reinforces apple-pie patriotism, while any news that
challenges the notion that America is the greatest nation on earth is
quickly buried.
So
it is that many American media outlets have begun to forget Michael
Brown, the unarmed Black teenager who was shot to death by a white
cop in the town of Ferguson, Missouri. (Just as we've been made to
forget our ongoing problems with mass shootings
in this country, and the implications for American society.) I have
to confess that I am a bit amazed by the speed with which Mr. Brown's
story was replaced with stories about germs on keyboards, a rehash of
the last moments of the RMS Titanic, the saga of Michael Sam, and a
list of freaky things that happen to ordinary people, such as “8
year old girl saved by adoring pit bull.”
Fortunately,
Mr. Brown's story isn't entirely buried. The United Nations
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has issued a
condemnation
of the shooting of Michael Brown and a call to the United States to
eliminate ongoing racism and discrimination in this country. The
committee also called attention to the pernicious effect of
“stand-your-ground” laws in this country, and the continued
inequitable enforcement of the law by police departments which remain
largely white. But that's not front-page news today at Aol.com, or the New
York Times, or USA Today, and certainly not at the Wall
Street Journal, which was eaten a few years ago by Rupert
Murdoch, a bigoted rich Australian who applied for US citizenship in
the 1980's so that he could consolidate his ownership of American
media. And Michael Brown certainly didn't make it onto the cover of
People Magazine and other magazines like it, which have indeed
at times chosen to publish stories about ordinary Americans caught in
extraordinary circumstances. I guess he didn't have the potential
star power of Elizabeth
Smart.
Forgetfulness
can be dangerous. As can be the refusal to think through the
implications of a thing. When the town of Ferguson erupted in unrest
after the shooting of Michael Brown, the doofus mayor of Ferguson
declared
that “We don't have a race problem here.” That statement is an
example of willful blindness. And as Margaret Heffernan stated in
her book titled Willful Blindness, problems that are ignored
only become worse. The problem in the United States is that for a
very long time, the members of one dominant culture have subjugated,
oppressed, exploited and in many cases murdered other peoples both in
the United States and abroad, simply on the basis that the skin of
those other peoples was not white. The privileged people of the U.S.
did so in order to secure all the benefits, both material and
psychological, of being at the top of a heap. Such behavior has
unintended consequences, even though the consequences may seem to be
a long time in coming. Eventually the heap comes down, due in part
to the consequences of the actions of the people who built the heap
in the first place.
Consider
the “Stand Your Ground” laws, the latest outgrowth of the rabid
devotion to “2nd Amendment Rights” on the part of many
Republicans and white supremacists. A Wikipedia
article states that, according to many researchers, the effect of
those laws was “...a significant increase in homicide and
injury of whites, especially white males.” (Emphasis mine.)
Consider also something I wrote in an earlier post, namely, what
happens when a large, dominant group scapegoats another smaller and
weaker group. Eventually, if the scapegoating is cruel enough, the
smaller group is eradicated or removes itself from the scene – but
the dysfunction which led to its scapegoating continues to exist
within the larger group. There must always be a scapegoat in such
groups. Therefore, a fight ensues to see who gets to create a new
heap, and who will be at the top of it. The losers get to occupy the
place of “poor trash.”
Some of the newly-minted trash will be quite surprised at the change
of identity bestowed on them by their newly-minted masters. With
that change of identity will come the deprivation of civil rights and
the denial of due process, along with pervasive, yet subtle
discrimination based on the place of one's birth, one's income level
or the last names of one's parents. All these things have happened
before – even in seemingly homogeneous societies.
But
all this assumes that the builders of the heap are allowed to
continue sitting at its top. Those who comprise the lower levels of
the heap might just decide one day to tear the heap down. That sort
of thing has also happened before. A nation can't unrestrainedly
exploit its natural resource base without reaching a point of
diminishing, then negative returns. Neither can it exploit other
peoples without the same thing happening. So if you're not in a forgetful mood, here's something to think about: first, how, in the midst of diminishing resources, to create a society (or a social circle) in which resources are shared equitably and people are valued equally.
Saturday, August 23, 2014
The Grey Town of St. Louis County
If
a person wants to read about
racist policemen killing Black men or using excessive force against
them, there's no shortage of stories this week. New York City has
come again into the spotlight,
which isn't surprising, given their long history of questionable
policing. But
for this post, I want to continue to focus on Ferguson, Missouri, and
Saint Louis County, where Ferguson is located.
An
early indication of the fairness of the “justice” which Michael
Brown's family can expect is the refusal
by
Missouri Governor Jay Nixon to appoint a special prosecutor to
replace Robert McCulloch, the St. Louis County district attorney who
will likely be prosecuting the case against the officer who shot Mr.
Brown to death while he was unarmed. I
see no justice coming
for
Michael Brown or his family from St. Louis County or the Missouri
state government.
But
a
Business
Week
story that caught my eye a
few days ago provoked
a few
strands
of thought. The
story concerns
the description of the causes of the extreme fragmentation
of St. Louis County. Over time, the county has fragmented into 91
municipalities that “range from small to tiny, along with clots of
population in unincorporated areas.” Why this fragmentation?
First, because the law allowed residents to fragment themselves.
Secondly, because of the hellishly selfish motives of the residents,
who “set themselves up as municipalities to capture control of tax
revenue from local businesses, to avoid paying taxes to support
poorer neighbors, or to exclude blacks.” One of the municipalities
has only thirteen members – all of whom are white. And according
to the Business Week article, the extreme fragmentation of St. Louis
County is a key factor holding back economic development in that
county.
This
description of St. Louis County reminded me of the description of
Hell in The
Great Divorce,
a short novel
written by C.S. Lewis in the early 1940's. In
the story, Hell was likened to a shabby gray town (or grey, if you
prefer the British spelling) that seemed to go on forever, where the
time was always evening, and where it was always raining. Why was
the town so big? Because all the residents were so selfish and
self-centered that within 24 hours of arriving from Earth, a new
arrival would have quarreled with his or her neighbors and decided to
move on. Because
their selfishness was
by now
incurable, the residents continued to quarrel, and to move farther
and farther apart. When the narrator in the story asked whether one
could meet any famous people, he was told that they all lived really
far apart. He was also told of an expedition undertaken by a few
ordinary people to visit Napoleon Bonaparte – a journey which took
20,000 years. In order to locate his house, the expedition had to
use a telescope. It
seems those who hold power in St. Louis County have turned it into a
little bit of Hell, which is ironic considering how many churches
there are in the county. Truly
“the salt has lost its flavor!” (Matthew 5:13)
But
St. Louis County seems also to be a shining example of Dmitry Orlov's
Fifth Stage of Collapse,
in
which “faith in the goodness of humanity is lost.” People lose
their capacity for selflessness and concern for others, and become
like the Donner
Party, except that they don't wait for each other to die before
trying to chew on each other. Anglo-American supremacist culture is
an organism born already
collapsed,
with its emphasis on self-reliance, “freedom” from responsibility
to anyone but oneself, and
unrestrained competition. Even the privileged members of our society
cannot rest easy, as their identity depends a great deal on who and
how many people they can identify as being beneath them.
And
that leads to the third strand in this web of thought, namely, how
typical St. Louis County is of a narcissistically disordered family,
whose head cannot stand the presence of people different from himself
unless they are under his heel as scapegoats and dumping grounds for
unresolved anger and insecurity. The thing that many white
supremacists in this country don't realize is that even if they
succeed in ridding themselves of the “named” scapegoats, that
won't be the end of scapegoating, for some of their own number will
be selected as the replacements for the old scapegoats. They
don't seem to have the imagination to picture what that will be like.
St.
Louis County, Missouri. This
is the sort of place where Michael Brown, an unarmed black man, was
shot to death by a white policeman.
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
How to Digitally Fake A Video (or, They Only See What They Want To See)
My attention was drawn this
week to some rather arrogant and ignorant comments made by a
blogger/gadfly/wanna-be pontificator who, it seems, would like to
dictate to everyone in the world what their assigned places in the
world should be. This particular blogger mentioned the murder of
Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager, by a white policeman in
Ferguson, Missouri, and stated that a surveillance camera video had
surfaced that showed Mr. Brown allegedly robbing a convenience store
shortly before he was shot. Thus, in the mind of this particular
blogger, the shooting of Mr. Brown was no crime, but rather the
judgment of a righteous society against a Black population that
insists on remaining stubbornly dysfunctional.
There are only three
problems with this argument. First, it is very easy nowadays to
alter digital video – assuming that the original video was
authentically made by a convenience store video camera. If you want
to know just how easy video can be altered, read this
2007 article from Scientific American. Or you can read this,
or this.
Or, you can just watch the
video
yourself. And that leads to the second problem. The video sample I have selected is representative of the
quality one would expect from typical store surveillance cameras; in
other words, you don't use cameras like these to take pictures of the
rings of Saturn or to shoot blockbuster movies. You tell me: who can
positively identify the faces of anyone in the video? (If you want
another version of the video, watch this.
See how much clearer the image of the Fox News liar is than the
images of any of the people in the alleged robbery video? Also note
in the beginning of this clip, that Michael Brown wasn't the only
person in the world who liked red hats and white T-shirts.)
The third problem, of
course, is that the police let slip the fact that officer Darren
Wilson did not know about the alleged robbery when he stopped Michael
Brown. Thus Mr. Wilson's act looks increasingly like what I have
called it: murder.
A person who has learned how
to think would ask the following questions about video evidence:
first, what are typical surveillance camera capabilities (i.e., image
quality, resolution, low-light performance, etc)? Second, how easy
is it for an ordinary person to alter a digital video (and the vast
majority of videos nowadays are digital), or to create
a fake video from scratch? Third, are there unaltered, untampered
9-1-1 calls from Ferguson, Missouri, describing a convenience store
robbery on the day that Michael Brown was shot? Fourth, what
motivations would the various players in this drama have for lying?
Fifth, what sort of track record does the Ferguson police department
have in regard to misconduct?
Sixth, how often are unarmed Black men shot
in this country?
The answers to all these
questions might be deeply upsetting to those who enjoy the rapidly
fading vestiges of Anglo-American privilege. But the willingness to
ask the questions and to face the answers would separate honest
people from dishonest gadflies who hold and voice opinions simply
because they like them, regardless of the facts. Again, I am
thinking of the blogger I mentioned at the first, who said during the
most recent race riots in England that the British had a problem with
immigration (and who disregarded the way the British violated and
victimized nonwhite residents and citizens), and who said that
Haitians were starving because Haiti had a population control problem
(without considering how multinational corporations had stolen
everything they could steal from that country). How easy it is to
blame the victims for the injuries you have inflicted.
Saturday, August 16, 2014
Clocks Can't Be Run Backward Without Breaking
I've been following the
events in Ferguson,
Missouri, with more than a little interest. For those who don't
know, that is where Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, was
shot to death by policeman Darren Wilson several days ago. The Black
community in this country is not amused, to say the least. Most of
us believe that the case of Trayvon
Martin was a miscarriage of justice. It also seems to many of us
that the institutions of “justice” in this country are by now
little more than organs of self-expression for narcissistic,
sociopathic elites. One interesting thing about narcissism is the
need for people who are narcissists to project a grandiose image of
themselves. The other thing is that narcissists need an audience to
reflect that grandiose image back to themselves. Without that
audience, narcissists don't know they exist.
One way to project a
grandiose image on to others is to intimidate and oppress others.
That way, a narcissist can say, “At least I'm better off than this
person whom I am kicking around, this person on whom I project all my
insecurities and inadequacies, this person whom I can use as a
convenient dumping ground for all my hostility.” For a while the
cowboy narcissistic society known as the USA could use the entire
world as a mirror to reflect its grandiosity back to the eyes of the
chief beneficiaries of that grandiosity. And Anglo-Americans didn't
even have to leave the country to find people to kick around – what
with slavery, Jim Crow, separate-but-equal laws, and “institutional,”
covert racism, there were plenty of victims to dominate.
Then something happened –
a critical mass of unrest and unwillingness on the part of the
victims of this oppression to take any more. The unwillingness was
expressed in such a way that the beneficiaries of American privilege
saw that they couldn't continue in their evil ways without risking
the loss of that privilege, and maybe even of anything resembling a
civil society. That, I am sure, was one thing that persuaded the
leaders of American society to lighten up a little.
But now, the privileged
sector of the United States is losing its place in the world, due to
forces beyond its control. This seems to be provoking a
psychological crisis, and some of these people seem to want to roll
back the clock to a time when they could use nonwhite people in this
country as a punching bag/target stop/dumping ground for their
unresolved insecurity and hostility. In their clock-fixing attempts,
they are quite bold. But this shouldn't be happening, should it?
After all, we have a black President!
Yes we do. But over the
last five years, Barack Obama has very obviously proven himself to be
nothing more than the lesser of two evils. By now, when one says,
“the lesser of two evils,” the eyes of his audience usually glaze
over – the phrase has become a cliché. So let me present an
illustration. If a gang of thugs breaks down the door of your house
and tells you that you have a choice between having your teeth
punched down your throat or having your car torched, you have a
choice to make between the lesser of two evils! If we add a few more
evils to choose from, such as having your house burned down, having
your identity stolen, or being sexually assaulted (“raped” in
plainer language), you have the smorgasbord that American politics
has become with our token inclusion of third-party candidates like
Ron and Rand Paul. (Is a choice for Ron a choice to be raped? Is a choice for Rand a choice to drink battery acid?) I voted for Barack Obama twice because I didn't
want my teeth punched down my throat. But I have very little hope
that he will keep my house from being burned down. Obama does
seem quite hot to “protect” people in other countries from not
being raped by the West – even to the point of sending American
bombs, arms and troops where they're not wanted. What evil can you
live with, dear reader?
But to those who want to
roll back the clock, I have just one warning. By trying to make a
clock run backwards, you may wind up breaking the clock. I vividly
remember the overt racist garbage (utter garbage!) I had to put up
with growing up in this country, and the more covert and insidious
attempts to destroy me made by others whom I met in my adulthood.
And why? Because my skin looks different from theirs? What utter
garbage! What did I ever do to these people? Here's my policy: I
want my home and my life to be a clinic of mercy to anyone who needs
it, anyone who walks in the door – red or yellow, black or white.
But here's my warning to the clock-tinkerers: you won't peaceably
roll the clock back on me. I'm not putting up with it again.