So many mainstream outlets are spouting that line nowadays that it's becoming increasingly hard to go back to the primary sources which show that all that noise is in fact a pack of lies. But if one is determined and has the time for it, one can still dig out the truth. This weekend, I have a rare bit of spare time, and that is exactly what I've been doing with my time. Today's post is designed to equip you, the reader with a sturdy, leak-proof pair of hip boots so that you may be able to wade through piles of "deep fiction" without being sullied and without losing your footing on the firm ground of truth. Let's go for a walk, shall we?
First, then, let's discuss the origins of the movement now known as ISIS. Those origins go back to the late 1970's, when a pro-Marxist government came to power in Afghanistan, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's national security advisor, proposed a program of fomenting armed rebellion against the new regime. In an interview later, Brzezinski admitted that one of his goals was to draw the Soviet Union into a bloody armed conflict in Afghanistan. Unfortunately, the Soviets fell for the gambit, and sent in troops in December 1979. The Soviets found themselves facing an armed opposition which was largely drawn from radicalized Muslims who were foreign to Afghanistan, who had been recruited by the United States or its proxy countries. These warriors were at first deemed by the CIA to be more reliable for American interests than the native Afghans. However, a program was begun to radicalize the Afghan population, and this program reached even into Afghan schools with the supply of very violent propagandistic textbooks to Afghan children. (See this also.) The documents to which I have linked also show that U.S. funding of jihadist groups continued even after the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, and into the 1990's.
From 1992 until circa 2005, the trail of money and arms becomes somewhat harder to trace. I am sure that it could be traced, but it would take me quite a bit longer than a weekend to do so. (Here's a homework assignment for some adventurous soul, if you want it. And here is a good starting place.) However, the trail becomes easy to pick up again if we look at the last decade and a half. The trail is crystal-clear in Syria.
For instance, we now know without a doubt that a major goal of U.S. policy from 2005 onward has been the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The chosen pretext for this overthrow has been concern that President Assad stood in opposition to "human rights" and "democracy" in Syria. (Bloody hypocrites! If you're so concerned about "human rights," why are so many of you silent in the face of the abuses perpetrated by the prison-industrial complex, the police and the schools against people of color and dark-skinned immigrants right here in the U.S.? Serpents! Brood of vipers!) So starting from 2005 onward, various foreign actors (including Israeli and Turkish special operatives) staged "incidents" which "proved" that Assad was "abusing his people" and had to be removed. (There's also this, this and this. Note that the Turkish journalists who reported the role of Turkey in Syria are now in Turkish jails.)
So it was that the U.S. found it desirable to create, fund and grow an "opposition" movement in Syria, a movement which quickly became an armed rebellion with arms supplied by the U.S. As it was in Afghanistan, so in Syria also this movement is largely composed of fighters who are foreigners to Syria, fighters who are loyal to al-Qaeda, who was the bogeyman du jour prior to the emergence of ISIS (and whom the U.S. blamed for the 9/11 attacks, thus starting the American "War on Terror"). Here is a list of sources who trace the direct funding and equipping of these fighters by the United States from 2013 onward:
- "Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid from CIA"
- "West Training Syria Rebels In Jordan"
- "Americans Are Training Syria Rebels In Jordan: Spiegel"
- "Secret CIA Effort In Syria Faces Large Spending Cut"
So then, what exactly has the U.S. been doing in its "fight against ISIS"? First of all, the U.S. has been knowingly fighting a bogeyman of whom it is well known that it poses no threat to the U.S. The fight has also been a sham fight, in which after Obama's public vow to "crush ISIS," ISIS managed to overrun more than 70 percent of Syrian territory and large swaths of Iraq while U.S. warplanes destroyed infrastructure (oil refineries and other petroleum facilities, power plants, water treatment plants, and the like) located in territory belonging to President Assad, thus helping to create the current refugee crisis. Note also that U.S. warplanes recently bombed Syrian troops under the pretext of "fighting terror," then lied about it. Meanwhile, the U.S. was, until very recently, very sparing in its attacks against known ISIS targets - until the Russian intervention in October, which targeted, among other things, ISIS convoys illegally smuggling oil out of Syria and into Turkey. The fact that Russia is genuinely trying to crush these terrorists and is not playing games became a major embarrassment to the U.S., which responded by delivering an airstrike of its own against an ISIS oil convoy - but not without dropping leaflets warning ISIS truck drivers of the attack nearly an hour beforehand.
As for that stolen oil, it is also well known that ISIS has been benefiting the West by providing illegal sales of stolen Iraqi, Libyan and Syrian oil at less than half the fair market value, and that one of the major beneficiaries of this oil has been Turkey. (See this also.) This illegal oil trade has been known for at least a year, by the way.
So there you have it - ISIS as a bogeyman who is also a secret teddy bear of some well-placed, powerful interests in the West, and specifically in the United States. You can see how ISIS the bogeyman has been used as an instrument to divide and break strong sovereign states into failed states that are easily controlled and looted by the West. (You can also see the parallels between the uses made of ISIS and the use by the West of a bunch of foreign mercenaries and thugs of the worst type to break up the Ukraine. Too many of our "revolutions" have relied on "lewd fellows of the baser sort.")
You also have a bit of history to put the ISIS bogeyman into proper perspective. Out of that history I have fashioned a sturdy pair of hip boots. Yet I know that there are those, both great and small, in America who would rather wade through fields of deep fiction without any protection for their feet, because, while the truth will set a person free, it will also smash any patriotic narcissistic "grandiose self" he or she may have erected. There are those as well who want you to wind up with stinky feet, as the mainstream media engages in a frenzied effort to distort and bury the history of the last several years. (This is why, for instance, after the beginning of Russian military action, there were ludicrous assertions in mainstream outlets that U.S. efforts to train and arm "moderate Syrian rebels" were really for the purpose of training these "rebels" to fight ISIS. What a bunch of - er, um, ahem, "deep fiction"!)
The trouble is, lying to oneself and distorting one's personal history are the marks of a personality-disordered person. And some suggest that the longer a disordered person engages in such a game with himself, the more likely he is to wind up in a permanently demented condition. (See this and this also.) I am thinking of President Reagan, who testified during the Congressional hearings into the Iran-Contra affair that there were some things he simply couldn't remember. A few years later, he began to suffer from an actual inability to remember anything. Maybe he is a warning.