As I think about this present time, I am reminded of special days which I have grown to dislike over the years. One of those special days is, oddly enough, Christmas. Don't get me wrong - I am all for people taking time out of the year to celebrate the birth of Christ. What I choke on is being barraged by holiday music and holiday shopping advertisements from the day after Halloween until the day after New Year's. Another holiday I am not too fond of is Halloween (although I make sure to dress as a grown-up every year).
But the day which I have come to despise most of all in the United States is Election Day. Indeed, one of the most annoying aspects of life in the USA just now is the fact that we seem to be in a never-ending election season designed to produce maximal angst and fear among those who have to live through it. A particularly vexing element of this is having to cut through the games played by wolves who want to bury their real agenda behind a bunch of non-issues. Today's post will attempt to clarify the real issues at stake in the national elections, at least, as I see them.
Many of those who are campaigning for Donald Trump claim that a Trump presidency would bring world peace by ending American neocon attempts to expand American power throughout the world. Some of these people seek to paint Hillary Clinton as some sort of war criminal, either because some American operatives died at Benghazi after the U.S. had overthrown the lawful government of Gaddafi, or because Ms. Clinton had a personal Gmail account while she was Secretary of State. (If having a personal email account is a crime, you may as well throw many of us in jail, because we too have personal email accounts in addition to our work accounts.) Indeed, there are many mouthpieces trying by every possible means to make Mr. Trump palatable enough to get enough votes to win the Presidency. (Some of these people have actually tried to use the angle that he is "the lesser of two evils." They forget that by saying this they are admitting that he is evil.)
But if we take Mr. Trump at face value - especially concerning the statements and speeches which won him the Republican nomination - we see the real motive behind the Trump candidacy, and behind the efforts of the American right wing over the last decades. These efforts are coming to a head now, in 2016. For the central issue is the survival of white supremacy and First World hegemony. Trump and his supporters (along with the Murdoch and Breitbart media empires and American evangelical media) believe that this supremacy and hegemony are in mortal danger of being swept away, especially in the United States. Thus the candidacy of Trump represents a last-ditch attempt to stop the clock, or better yet, to reverse the clock of world history and to bring the 1950's back as a permanent state of world and national affairs. The 1950's hold special appeal for these people because these were the days in which white America dominated the world and Americans oppressed whomever they wanted to, without any fear of consequences or resistance. Americans who enjoyed the privileges of the 1950's grew to believe that they would never have a need for politeness, compromise, consensus, respect of differences, or the need to work harmoniously with others. And they even remade God into their own image (or for a while, as it seemed), as the God who "gave us this great land and promised us that we should rule the world!"
This has been the real agenda of the Right for a long time. This is the real agenda of the Right at this present time. This is what is at stake in the current election. And on a certain level, this agenda is not only national, but international in scope, although on the international level, there are some differences. (How many of you know that the far-right movements now at work in Europe are partially financed by Russia? See this also. And Russia is financing Trump.) On the international level, the agenda morphs into an effort to maintain the hegemony of the First World over the rest of the earth, by attempting to arrive at a gentleman's agreement over who is allowed to exercise control over particular "spheres of influence". The gentleman's agreement is then paid for at the expense of the nonwhite majority world, who get to enjoy continuing to be carved up by First World "spheres of influence" while being excluded from the concentrations of wealth which the nations of the First World have amassed by robbing everyone else blind.
The trouble with establishing such an agenda is that the factors which would cause such an agenda to succeed are now changing very rapidly. As far as the United States, the most recent census data shows that by 2020, the majority of children in the United States will be nonwhite. From 2011 onward, the majority of births in the United States each year have been nonwhite. Moreover, many of these children are multiracial. And they do not have the same agenda as the media outlets whose mouthpieces constantly demonize them as "terrorists," "heathen," "criminals" or "savages." They don't care about Benghazi or emails. They (and their parents) just want to live their lives in peace. But because the current masters of American society continue to engage in conversations which the future majority population doesn't care about, the current masters of America risk becoming irrelevant in very short order. This translates to a loss of power, if by power one means the power to bully, to oppress, to rob, to dominate, to impose oneself and one's culture on others.
The same trends are at work in Europe, which is why many European far-right groups have arisen to try to stop this process. It could also be argued that this is a motivation for the Russian intervention in Syria. Don't get me wrong - I think that the attempt by the West to overthrow yet another country should have been stopped. However, based on things I have learned and sources I have read over the last several months, I don't believe the Russians intervened out of the goodness of their hearts, but rather, to stop the influx of people considered nonwhite into Europe (and potentially, into Russia).
Trump supporters have the misguided hope that perhaps he can reverse the loss of white supremacy in the U.S. - perhaps by a massive increase in police shootings of unarmed black Americans, or perhaps by wholesale, indiscriminate deportation of anyone who looks foreign or has a non-English last name, even if they were born in the U.S. (Such deportations have happened before in U.S. history, by the way.) But there is yet another trend at work which cannot be stopped by any political leader on earth. And that trend is the continued impoverishment and decline of the global industrial economy owned and controlled by the nations of the First World. For that decline is driven inexorably by the depletion of the resources needed to make that economy run. Global production of all petroleum products is now past peak. Coal production is about to peak, if it has not already. The same is true of many other resources. This also translates to a loss of power on the part of those who were formerly dominant. How will the formerly powerful respond to the impending loss of their power? Their response will show whether they have learned to become decent people or whether they are still wolves.
In closing, I will mention the church service I attended today. It was at a Vietnamese church which shares a church building with a Hispanic congregation and a Karen (Myanmar/Thai) congregation. This Vietnamese congregation held a joint Vacation Bible School with their Hispanic brethren this past summer. Their youth groups have also had joint worship services together. A couple of Christmases ago, I visited this church and heard some of the Vietnamese children singing Feliz Navidad. I have also seen some of the Mexican members of the Hispanic church attending the Vietnamese Nativity service. Today, the Vietnamese pastor was preaching out of Romans 12:6-8, and he was talking about how there is tremendous diversity in humanity. He also mentioned that in the Body of Christ, that diversity is part of a unity. (I was also able to see his sermon notes on a church member's iPad, and in his notes the pastor had alluded to the great evil of trying to persecute each other over our differences.) The pastor and his congregation are not terrorists or criminals, but they have learned how to get along with others and how to be a blessing to others. Why is it so hard for mainstream America to learn this lesson? Could it be that America is infected by a terminal case of narcissism?
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Friday, September 16, 2016
I Don't Care About Benghazi
There. I said it. But why did it need to be said?
Many people have written about the campaign of Donald Trump that his campaign is entirely self-financed and that he is thus a self-made populist phenomenon. People who say such things conveniently neglect the fact that Mr. Trump is getting a lot of free publicity both from the American mainstream media (which is by now almost wholly owned by a handful of pathological people) and by well-placed members of foreign governments (among which is the government of Russia).
One big source of publicity for Mr. Trump is the Republican-controlled Congress, which has been trying very hard now for the last few years to make the American people outraged over the deaths of some American ambassadors to Libya, and to blame their deaths on a supposed failure on the part of the American State Department to provide them with adequate protection. But here's the thing. First, the U.S. overthrew the government of Libya in a totally un-justified act of aggression in 2011. NATO bombed Libya back to the Stone Age and turned millions of Libyans into refugees who have since been allowed to drown in the Mediterranean Sea or die of exposure in refugee camps in their desperate bid for asylum in Europe. So it's hard for me to get worked up over American operatives suffering a bit of collateral damage in their bid to make Libya an American possession.
But the attempt to stir up outrage over Benghazi stinks even more when one considers that the attack has all the makings of a false flag operation, complete with assigning of blame to "Islamic militants" tied to ISIS and Al-Qaeda. The fact that the Republicans are attempting to use Benghazi as a rallying cry shows that they are just as neocon as they accuse the Democrats of being. And the fact that the Republicans have no remorse for the Libyans whose lives have been wrecked by American aggression, along with the record of all the things Donald Trump has said over the last few years shows the real motivation of the Republicans and of all who support Trump: to establish a world and a nation subject to white supremacy, a world which continues to be victimized by the rich, the powerful and the privileged. What I care about is what these people intend to do to the rest of us - not only to the nonwhite, but to everyone who is poor enough to be counted as prey by these people. I care that the U.S. is in danger of being ruled by a maniacally malignant man who is desperately looking for a scapegoated group onto whom he can vomit his hostility. Excuse me while I gag.
Many people have written about the campaign of Donald Trump that his campaign is entirely self-financed and that he is thus a self-made populist phenomenon. People who say such things conveniently neglect the fact that Mr. Trump is getting a lot of free publicity both from the American mainstream media (which is by now almost wholly owned by a handful of pathological people) and by well-placed members of foreign governments (among which is the government of Russia).
One big source of publicity for Mr. Trump is the Republican-controlled Congress, which has been trying very hard now for the last few years to make the American people outraged over the deaths of some American ambassadors to Libya, and to blame their deaths on a supposed failure on the part of the American State Department to provide them with adequate protection. But here's the thing. First, the U.S. overthrew the government of Libya in a totally un-justified act of aggression in 2011. NATO bombed Libya back to the Stone Age and turned millions of Libyans into refugees who have since been allowed to drown in the Mediterranean Sea or die of exposure in refugee camps in their desperate bid for asylum in Europe. So it's hard for me to get worked up over American operatives suffering a bit of collateral damage in their bid to make Libya an American possession.
But the attempt to stir up outrage over Benghazi stinks even more when one considers that the attack has all the makings of a false flag operation, complete with assigning of blame to "Islamic militants" tied to ISIS and Al-Qaeda. The fact that the Republicans are attempting to use Benghazi as a rallying cry shows that they are just as neocon as they accuse the Democrats of being. And the fact that the Republicans have no remorse for the Libyans whose lives have been wrecked by American aggression, along with the record of all the things Donald Trump has said over the last few years shows the real motivation of the Republicans and of all who support Trump: to establish a world and a nation subject to white supremacy, a world which continues to be victimized by the rich, the powerful and the privileged. What I care about is what these people intend to do to the rest of us - not only to the nonwhite, but to everyone who is poor enough to be counted as prey by these people. I care that the U.S. is in danger of being ruled by a maniacally malignant man who is desperately looking for a scapegoated group onto whom he can vomit his hostility. Excuse me while I gag.
Saturday, July 9, 2016
A Brief History of COINTELPRO in America
Another week, another mass shooting in America. (Actually, there were several, but only one managed to be selected as worthy of national news coverage.) I overheard a couple of co-workers yesterday talking about what happened in Dallas on Thursday night. They were eyeing me during their undertone conversation, so, having no TV and blissfully unaware of Thursday's events, I strolled over cheerfully and asked, "What's up?" They proceeded to tell me, and to offer a number of opinions regarding how American society should view both Black lives and police lives. My next words must have shocked them. "Have you ever heard of a false flag operation?" I asked.
From the looks on their faces, I could tell that this was not a possibility they had considered, even though one of them acknowledged that he knew what the term means. I consider this to be a shocking failure of our outlets of culture and media to inform adults who have the right to vote, who live in what is supposedly the "most powerful country on earth," and who therefore should be much better informed. Consider this post to be my attempt to rectify this deficiency.
I want to begin by introducing a potentially unfamiliar term to you. According to Wikipedia, COINTELPRO "was a series of covert, and at times, illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations." The COINTELPRO operation was conceived under FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. Note the words, "discrediting" and "disrupting." If you read the Wikipedia article, you can see the United States from the 1950's to the 1970's as a nation whose favored members enjoyed the greatest privilege the world had ever seen - yet that privilege was built on the backs of those peoples of the world who had been violently oppressed in order to build that privilege. So the favored members of American society lived in a great deal of insecurity and felt horribly threatened by the presence of any voices challenging their privilege and the oppression on which that privilege had been built. They were frightened by those voices which were asking for a more equitable life for all. COINTELPRO was designed by the FBI and others as a way to discredit and neutralize the voices of those who protested the oppressive order set up by the United States and other First World nations. Read how COINTELPRO especially targeted the leaders of the Black Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's. One of the tactics of COINTELPRO was the use of agents provocateurs, paid police agents used to attempt to incite protest organizations to engage in illegal activity so that law enforcement would have a justification for arrests.
One thing to note: there is at least one case on record of undercover police being implicated in staging violence by protesters against police during a political rally. I am sure there are many more cases that can may be discovered by an enterprising researcher. I leave that as an exercise for the reader. (You might start here, here, here, here, or here. Goodness gracious, I think I've done a lot of the work for you!)
Now a funny thing happened in the 1970's. In 1971, the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI managed to break into an FBI office, and stole several files which contained records of the COINTELPRO operation. (See this also.) They then dutifully leaked these records to the press. Many press outlets refused to publish the leaked documents, but they eventually were widely circulated, and the FBI was forced to ostensibly "end" COINTELPRO. But like many things that are evil (including sewage leaks), the basic mechanisms of COINTELPRO never really ended. They just went underground. (See what was done in the 1980's to environmental protest groups, for instance.) Indeed, the Wikipedia article cited at the beginning of this post shows that from 1980 onward (and especially during the presidency of George W. Bush), there has been a sharp revival of COINTELPRO-like operations.
As far as the Dallas sniper incident, note the following details:
I agree with her.
From the looks on their faces, I could tell that this was not a possibility they had considered, even though one of them acknowledged that he knew what the term means. I consider this to be a shocking failure of our outlets of culture and media to inform adults who have the right to vote, who live in what is supposedly the "most powerful country on earth," and who therefore should be much better informed. Consider this post to be my attempt to rectify this deficiency.
I want to begin by introducing a potentially unfamiliar term to you. According to Wikipedia, COINTELPRO "was a series of covert, and at times, illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations." The COINTELPRO operation was conceived under FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. Note the words, "discrediting" and "disrupting." If you read the Wikipedia article, you can see the United States from the 1950's to the 1970's as a nation whose favored members enjoyed the greatest privilege the world had ever seen - yet that privilege was built on the backs of those peoples of the world who had been violently oppressed in order to build that privilege. So the favored members of American society lived in a great deal of insecurity and felt horribly threatened by the presence of any voices challenging their privilege and the oppression on which that privilege had been built. They were frightened by those voices which were asking for a more equitable life for all. COINTELPRO was designed by the FBI and others as a way to discredit and neutralize the voices of those who protested the oppressive order set up by the United States and other First World nations. Read how COINTELPRO especially targeted the leaders of the Black Civil Rights Movement in the 1960's. One of the tactics of COINTELPRO was the use of agents provocateurs, paid police agents used to attempt to incite protest organizations to engage in illegal activity so that law enforcement would have a justification for arrests.
One thing to note: there is at least one case on record of undercover police being implicated in staging violence by protesters against police during a political rally. I am sure there are many more cases that can may be discovered by an enterprising researcher. I leave that as an exercise for the reader. (You might start here, here, here, here, or here. Goodness gracious, I think I've done a lot of the work for you!)
Now a funny thing happened in the 1970's. In 1971, the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI managed to break into an FBI office, and stole several files which contained records of the COINTELPRO operation. (See this also.) They then dutifully leaked these records to the press. Many press outlets refused to publish the leaked documents, but they eventually were widely circulated, and the FBI was forced to ostensibly "end" COINTELPRO. But like many things that are evil (including sewage leaks), the basic mechanisms of COINTELPRO never really ended. They just went underground. (See what was done in the 1980's to environmental protest groups, for instance.) Indeed, the Wikipedia article cited at the beginning of this post shows that from 1980 onward (and especially during the presidency of George W. Bush), there has been a sharp revival of COINTELPRO-like operations.
As far as the Dallas sniper incident, note the following details:
- Not only were police shot, but protesters as well. (How very similar to what happened in Maidan in the Ukraine just before the Western backed coup that plunged that country into civil war.)
- Initial reports stated that several snipers were involved, and a number of Black men were arrested. However, the official police story against these men fell apart, and the official narrative was changed to implicate only one man, who, of course, "died in a gun battle with police" after managing to fire on police from several positions in a superhuman feat of mobility.
- Police responders and media were conveniently on scene to provide an instant high-drama "response" to the incident.
- The man who has been implicated as the lone sniper is conveniently very dead right now, and therefore cannot stand trial.
- The dead man was implicated in less than 24 hours after the incident, in contrast to the many unreported mass shootings (defined as shootings in which four or more people are hit), in which police don't find a perpetrator for days or weeks.
- The dead man's race and supposed political ideology were used to attempt to implicate and scapegoat entire group of people in order to justify the ongoing oppression and violence practiced by a dominant majority against this group.
I agree with her.
Saturday, July 2, 2016
Zombies of London
Image taken from The Dreadful Story of Pauline and the Matches, Heinrich Hoffman, 1858.
(I offer my apologies in advance to Warren Zevon.)
One of the ways in which personality-disordered people sometimes garner lots of attention to themselves is by committing suicide in a slow, dramatic way. Imagine, for instance, someone climbing in broad daylight to the very top of the arch of the Fremont Bridge in Portland, Oregon, while wearing a bright fluorescent lime-green clown suit. Picture him swaying precariously over the Willamette River while screaming his intentions through a bullhorn to all and sundry for an hour or so. Then, after traffic has shut down in both directions, while drivers are out of their cars staring raptly skyward, and news crews swarm like bugs in helicopters all around the bridge, watch him jump off and make the biggest (and last) splash of his entire life as he hits the water.
.jpg){kind=link}
That's how Great Britain seems to me in the aftermath of the Brexit vote. While I have been following the rise of far-right racist ultranationalism in Europe over the last few years, I hadn't been watching Britain very closely. Much of what I know has been hastily gleaned from news over the last two weeks. Many of you may know far more. Yet things have played out pretty much as I might have expected, and the British are now getting their very own taste of the outworkings of damnation.
Here's what I know so far:
- The breeding ground of the Brexit campaign consisted of the frustrations of many Britons who were experiencing the loss of the standard of living that had been promised to them under a "free market", capitalist economy. They felt that their country was at the mercy of a foreign bureaucracy over which they had no control. In this, as an observer in the USA, I'd have to agree somewhat with them.
- That frustration was fed and amplified by the fomenting and encouragement of completely unrealistic racial and national pride, violent racism and dangerous xenophobia. Immigrants - especially the dark-skinned, and especially the Muslim - were targeted and blamed for the unraveling of the British working class and middle class. (But surprisingly, that blaming extended to the targeting and blaming of white Eastern Europeans as well.)
- The cheerleaders of the campaign to scapegoat immigrants - the same who championed the entire Brexit campaign - were a handful of doofus fly-by-nighters, among whom were Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, and Nigel Farage. They played a classic scapegoating game of the type seen in textbook cases of dysfunctional families where the family member who is causing the greatest damage manages to deflect blame onto a family member who has no logical connection to the suffering which the family is experiencing. Farage, Gove, and Johnson are members of Britain's wealthiest class, and it is the predatory policies which this class has championed, not only in Britain, but worldwide, which are causing the suffering now being experienced by ordinary Britons. (For an example of predatory policies, try looking up the word "austerity" and the phrase "income inequality.")
- It is also coming out now that many of the claims made by these men during the Brexit campaign were in fact lies. Indeed, Nigel Farage has admitted that some of his claims were false. I think he feels free to admit this because he feels that his victory is now secure. Also, the Brexit campaign led directly to the murder of a British member of Parliament in a killing that had a distinctively American style, as a gun was used by a disgruntled Angry White Male to do the killing.
And now that enjoyable position, and all that depends on it, has all gone up in smoke, set on fire by the architects of the Brexit. Other nations are already re-thinking their reliance on British financial services. The British pound has already suffered a drastic decline. The Brexit architects have, in the space of two weeks, already shown themselves to be incapable of governing a country. (Hey, man, if your feet can't reach the pedals, you shouldn't be behind the wheel.) The Brexit is already threatening a serious increase in trouble for an economy that was already in trouble. (See this, this and this, for instance.) And the Brexit vote has fractured the British body politic - perhaps incurably. Britain is about to find out in a hurry that it is no autarky, no self-sufficient paradise.
I know that Schadenfreude is a sin, yet there is something in me right now that feels more than a little satisfaction. It is a dark satisfaction, the kind that a researcher or scientist might feel when reality validates a theoretical model, even though that model has predicted something horrible. For the troubles that Britain has gotten itself into are a direct validation of Galatians 6:7 - "Don't be deceived. God is not mocked. For whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption..." It is also bitingly funny (more bite than a very strong and bitter cup of espresso!) to think of how the Brexit champions will cope with the damage they've done, now that they are running out of scapegoats. Think of the doofus right here in the USA who is pulling similar scapegoating stunts in a bid to capture the White House this November.
Sunday, June 26, 2016
A Bag of Smashed Chips
News is like cheaply made clothes, sometimes - it's flashy and new for a week, then starts to fade alarmingly, and before you know it, there's a hole in your trousers at the knees. So it is with the Orlando shooting and the uses certain people tried to make of it. I was fully intending to write a long expose of the uses which the campaign of Donald Trump was trying to make of the shooting (although I wasn't really looking forward to the task; there are a lot of weeds yet to chop down in the backyard and I'm tired). But events have taken a turn which seems to have resolved a great deal of what I was going to say.
It is well known that the campaign of Donald Trump has made the scapegoating of minorities and immigrants of color a central feature of its strategy for winning the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. In this, Trump has mirrored many European leaders, who, faced with the inevitable loss of the wealth and power of their respective nations, have sought to blame that loss on a supposed overwhelming influx of supposedly savage, half-human invaders commonly known as "immigrants" and "refugees." It is well-known that Europe and the United States created that flood of immigrants and refugees by smashing the home countries of those refugees into bits and digesting those bits for food.
(To channel an old, rather dumb sci-fi TV series, "They say there's no devil, Jim, but there is...right out of hell! I saw it!...It destroys planets, chops them into rubble...")
A central feature of that smashing has been the use of scapegoating to justify the smashing and the resultant inhumane treatment of the smashed populations. A central feature of that scapegoating has been the portrayal of the target populations as fanatically, destructively insane people controlled by some ideologically insane organization which wants to attack the West solely because it "hates our freedoms!!!", and which we must therefore smash and attack first. Thus we have forced the populations we want to smash and loot to serve as mirrors reflecting back to our eyes a Doomsday Machine which the West is actually guilty of being. But to perpetuate the lie we have told ourselves about ourselves and about the populations we have decided to target, we have invented bogeymen which are supposed to represent the populations we have targeted. Thus ISIS has come into being, just as Al-Qaeda came into being, and has served the same purpose for us that we caused Al-Qaeda to serve until Al-Qaeda outlived its usefulness.
ISIS was used as a justification for attempting to smash Syria - but a funny thing happened along the way. A large number of Syrians, Libyans and North Africans became refugees and fled to the countries of Europe to escape the smashing, and to be fed some of the crumbs of the loot which Europe and the United States had stolen from them at gunpoint. Europe - pure as the wind-driven snow and special, oh, so special - could not tolerate having dark-skinned, unchurched refugees in their midst, so a number of rather inexplicable incidents started to occur in Europe over the last year and a half - none of which made any strategic or tactical sense, and all of which were blamed on "ISIS agents masquerading as refugees." (See this and this for a catalogue of some of these incidents.)
As I said, these incidents made no tactical or strategic sense if they were actually perpetrated by Muslims trying to destroy the West, for the same reason that if you are actually trying to kill a bear, it makes no sense to do nothing more than hit him across the snout with a hickory switch. All that does is make the bear mad at you. But these incidents made perfect sense if their purpose was to rouse Europe and the United States into taking drastic steps toward fascism - steps like trying ever harder to find some justification for invading Syria and any other Muslim or African country they could get their hands on, and closing their borders to refugees in order to "protect themselves" from further attack.
So in the wake of supposed Muslim attacks by "ISIS", a bunch of European nations closed their borders to immigrants (especially dark-skinned immigrants) and refugees, and the United States followed suit - especially in Southern states. And a few incidents occurred right here in the USA in order to add momentum to the push by certain elements in this country to preserve a pure "American paradise" that did not have to share its ill-gotten gains with the people it had robbed at gunpoint and smashed.
But another funny thing started to happen. An increasing number of people began to view all the supposed attacks by ISIS as false-flag operations, self-wounding operations carried out by well-placed Americans in order to gain sympathy for their narcissistic agenda. (I have spent several months looking at Uncle Sam as a narcissistic personality, but really, the more I think about it, there is also more than a hint of borderline personality disorder at work in the mainstream American psyche.) Now things are at the point where whenever a supposed "ISIS attack" is publicized by the American mainstream media, it is met by a growing and deafening chorus of skeptics like me who are shouting "False Flag!" And mainstream media outlets - which at first ignored us, then made light of us - are now having to take time to answer us seriously. (See this for instance.) But that is not helping them, because the fact that they must now take serious time for serious answers means that people are now having to seriously consider our arguments. The fact that we must now be taken seriously means that we have won a victory.
The result of that is that many of the associations between Omar Mateen and ISIS which were made by the mainstream media in the first few days after the Orlando nightclub shooting have been carefully and quietly scrubbed from the ongoing narrative of that shooting. To associate that incident with ISIS is to give one's credibility the kiss of death.
And Donald Trump - who has become the American embodiment of all the right-wing, racist intolerance which has revived in Europe - has found that the Orlando shooting has not helped him. Rather, his insane remarks in the wake of the shooting have actually hurt him. (See this, this and this.)
Meanwhile, this weekend we are seeing in Britain the sort of consequences which begin to unfold when a bunch of people who think they are All That And A Bag Of Chips cut themselves off from the rest of the world. What if that sort of people wins control of the United States this November?
It is well known that the campaign of Donald Trump has made the scapegoating of minorities and immigrants of color a central feature of its strategy for winning the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. In this, Trump has mirrored many European leaders, who, faced with the inevitable loss of the wealth and power of their respective nations, have sought to blame that loss on a supposed overwhelming influx of supposedly savage, half-human invaders commonly known as "immigrants" and "refugees." It is well-known that Europe and the United States created that flood of immigrants and refugees by smashing the home countries of those refugees into bits and digesting those bits for food.
(To channel an old, rather dumb sci-fi TV series, "They say there's no devil, Jim, but there is...right out of hell! I saw it!...It destroys planets, chops them into rubble...")
A central feature of that smashing has been the use of scapegoating to justify the smashing and the resultant inhumane treatment of the smashed populations. A central feature of that scapegoating has been the portrayal of the target populations as fanatically, destructively insane people controlled by some ideologically insane organization which wants to attack the West solely because it "hates our freedoms!!!", and which we must therefore smash and attack first. Thus we have forced the populations we want to smash and loot to serve as mirrors reflecting back to our eyes a Doomsday Machine which the West is actually guilty of being. But to perpetuate the lie we have told ourselves about ourselves and about the populations we have decided to target, we have invented bogeymen which are supposed to represent the populations we have targeted. Thus ISIS has come into being, just as Al-Qaeda came into being, and has served the same purpose for us that we caused Al-Qaeda to serve until Al-Qaeda outlived its usefulness.
ISIS was used as a justification for attempting to smash Syria - but a funny thing happened along the way. A large number of Syrians, Libyans and North Africans became refugees and fled to the countries of Europe to escape the smashing, and to be fed some of the crumbs of the loot which Europe and the United States had stolen from them at gunpoint. Europe - pure as the wind-driven snow and special, oh, so special - could not tolerate having dark-skinned, unchurched refugees in their midst, so a number of rather inexplicable incidents started to occur in Europe over the last year and a half - none of which made any strategic or tactical sense, and all of which were blamed on "ISIS agents masquerading as refugees." (See this and this for a catalogue of some of these incidents.)
As I said, these incidents made no tactical or strategic sense if they were actually perpetrated by Muslims trying to destroy the West, for the same reason that if you are actually trying to kill a bear, it makes no sense to do nothing more than hit him across the snout with a hickory switch. All that does is make the bear mad at you. But these incidents made perfect sense if their purpose was to rouse Europe and the United States into taking drastic steps toward fascism - steps like trying ever harder to find some justification for invading Syria and any other Muslim or African country they could get their hands on, and closing their borders to refugees in order to "protect themselves" from further attack.
So in the wake of supposed Muslim attacks by "ISIS", a bunch of European nations closed their borders to immigrants (especially dark-skinned immigrants) and refugees, and the United States followed suit - especially in Southern states. And a few incidents occurred right here in the USA in order to add momentum to the push by certain elements in this country to preserve a pure "American paradise" that did not have to share its ill-gotten gains with the people it had robbed at gunpoint and smashed.
But another funny thing started to happen. An increasing number of people began to view all the supposed attacks by ISIS as false-flag operations, self-wounding operations carried out by well-placed Americans in order to gain sympathy for their narcissistic agenda. (I have spent several months looking at Uncle Sam as a narcissistic personality, but really, the more I think about it, there is also more than a hint of borderline personality disorder at work in the mainstream American psyche.) Now things are at the point where whenever a supposed "ISIS attack" is publicized by the American mainstream media, it is met by a growing and deafening chorus of skeptics like me who are shouting "False Flag!" And mainstream media outlets - which at first ignored us, then made light of us - are now having to take time to answer us seriously. (See this for instance.) But that is not helping them, because the fact that they must now take serious time for serious answers means that people are now having to seriously consider our arguments. The fact that we must now be taken seriously means that we have won a victory.
The result of that is that many of the associations between Omar Mateen and ISIS which were made by the mainstream media in the first few days after the Orlando nightclub shooting have been carefully and quietly scrubbed from the ongoing narrative of that shooting. To associate that incident with ISIS is to give one's credibility the kiss of death.
And Donald Trump - who has become the American embodiment of all the right-wing, racist intolerance which has revived in Europe - has found that the Orlando shooting has not helped him. Rather, his insane remarks in the wake of the shooting have actually hurt him. (See this, this and this.)
Meanwhile, this weekend we are seeing in Britain the sort of consequences which begin to unfold when a bunch of people who think they are All That And A Bag Of Chips cut themselves off from the rest of the world. What if that sort of people wins control of the United States this November?
Sunday, June 19, 2016
A June Commentary on the Flux of Election-Year Events
I noticed this week that someone posted a recent comment on my post, "The Breakup of Pathological Spaces." I also noticed two other things: first, that my site traffic has recently gone through the roof, and second, that my commenter made a few violations of my comment policy. The first violation was in posting anonymously. (Normally, I don't publish anonymous comments. Google ID or equivalent is required.) The second was in throwing some profanity into his (her?) comment. I only publish comments that are written in family-friendly language. Call me old-fashioned, or a "prude", but I have my reasons, and no one has been able to talk me out of them.
However, when someone puts up a spirited disagreement with one of my posts, I am strongly tempted to give them a hearing, even if they violate my policies. So I have decided to reproduce Mr. (Mrs.? Ms.?) Anonymous' comment below (with some minor edits):
"A rather foolish contortion of NPD to fit your "America so evil" narrative. On another note, calling what happened in Orlando a false flag is disgraceful to us gays (yes I am gay, and a liberty-lover just the same), I really should be commenting on that post but alas its to the same end. How can you honestly imply American culture is at-large more narcissistic, more sociopathic than the self-righteous dogmatism of Islam, which could [care] less about the freedoms of women, gays, any free thinking person, of freedom of spirit and heart? Sure the power elites ripping the world to shreds are sociopathic slime, but western individualism is not simply narcissism. Collectivism is at the heart of all governmental evil in this world. Baffles me to think people are still defending muslims who hide their immorality, sadism and vitriol behind their [garbage] religion, playing the victim at every corner until they're in every corner of western civilization because of the white man's pathological on..."
(Here Blogger cut off the rest of the comment. Anonymous, whoever you are, if you want to finish your thought, feel free to submit the rest of what you wanted to say - subject to my comment policy, of course!)
But for now, I have a few answers to the comment from Anonymous. As to the assertion I have made that mainstream American culture is increasingly narcissistic and sociopathic, just look at how widely the ideals of selfishness are preached nowadays - through the mouths of entire political parties (Republicans and parties to the right of them); through mainstream American evangelicalism which venerates predatory capitalism, American exceptionalism and white supremacy; and a "press" which is no longer free, but wholly owned by a handful of sick rich people (Rupert Murdoch being one of them) who want to reproduce their disease in as much of their audience as possible. (Ever heard of Ayn Rand?)
As for the assertion that calling Orlando a false flag is disrespectful to the victims, there are people who for years have called 9/11 a false flag, yet these people meant no disrespect to those victims. False flag operations do hurt people - that I acknowledge. Yet the attempt to investigate the question of why a thing happened must rest on a truthful examination of facts, because it is the body of facts which determines why things happen and who the perpetrators are. Asking "Why" is not disrespectful to the victims, nor is it disrespectful to pay careful attention to who benefits from a thing that has happened or what use (political and otherwise) is being made of that thing. Your statement about being disgraceful is a non sequitur.
Lastly, regarding Islam, let me tell you something. I am a Biblical Christian, and not a Muslim. I will never convert to Islam. However, I think that Islam has been set up as a convenient scapegoat for decades, complete with its convenient stereotype of the typical Muslim as some emotional, crazed, violent fanatic who goes around killing people solely because he "hates their freedoms!!!!!" You are a self-professed homosexual, and yet it is ironic that you are spouting the same sort of stereotyped cliches that the American Religious Right spouted after 9/11. (Here are two books to check out: The Blood of the Moon, and Islam Unveiled. The latter book must have set a world speed record for being written and published within a few short months after the 9/11 attacks. (It was published on January 1, 2002!) Rather odd, considering that for a long time, the typical time to publish a book from the finishing of the author's manuscript was two years.)
A closer look at the reality of Islam in the world today - if you actually care to take a look - will reveal a much more diverse body of practitioners than you may have realized. You will understand that there are divisions within Islam that are very similar in many ways to the denominations of Christianity. You would also have discovered a host of Islamic countries where the values of community and hospitality are so deeply ingrained in the culture that Western visitors are blown away by the kindnesses they receive. (Check out some bicycle touring blogs if you don't believe me - like "To Catch A Rainbow (Somewhere In Iran)", "Iran Alborz Mountains", and TravellingTwo.)
Anonymous, you've been living in a toxic bubble of American propaganda for too long. Step away from the Kool-Aid, please...
For the rest of my readers, my next blog post will describe the ways in which the campaign of Donald Trump has been using the Orlando mass shooting.
However, when someone puts up a spirited disagreement with one of my posts, I am strongly tempted to give them a hearing, even if they violate my policies. So I have decided to reproduce Mr. (Mrs.? Ms.?) Anonymous' comment below (with some minor edits):
"A rather foolish contortion of NPD to fit your "America so evil" narrative. On another note, calling what happened in Orlando a false flag is disgraceful to us gays (yes I am gay, and a liberty-lover just the same), I really should be commenting on that post but alas its to the same end. How can you honestly imply American culture is at-large more narcissistic, more sociopathic than the self-righteous dogmatism of Islam, which could [care] less about the freedoms of women, gays, any free thinking person, of freedom of spirit and heart? Sure the power elites ripping the world to shreds are sociopathic slime, but western individualism is not simply narcissism. Collectivism is at the heart of all governmental evil in this world. Baffles me to think people are still defending muslims who hide their immorality, sadism and vitriol behind their [garbage] religion, playing the victim at every corner until they're in every corner of western civilization because of the white man's pathological on..."
(Here Blogger cut off the rest of the comment. Anonymous, whoever you are, if you want to finish your thought, feel free to submit the rest of what you wanted to say - subject to my comment policy, of course!)
But for now, I have a few answers to the comment from Anonymous. As to the assertion I have made that mainstream American culture is increasingly narcissistic and sociopathic, just look at how widely the ideals of selfishness are preached nowadays - through the mouths of entire political parties (Republicans and parties to the right of them); through mainstream American evangelicalism which venerates predatory capitalism, American exceptionalism and white supremacy; and a "press" which is no longer free, but wholly owned by a handful of sick rich people (Rupert Murdoch being one of them) who want to reproduce their disease in as much of their audience as possible. (Ever heard of Ayn Rand?)
As for the assertion that calling Orlando a false flag is disrespectful to the victims, there are people who for years have called 9/11 a false flag, yet these people meant no disrespect to those victims. False flag operations do hurt people - that I acknowledge. Yet the attempt to investigate the question of why a thing happened must rest on a truthful examination of facts, because it is the body of facts which determines why things happen and who the perpetrators are. Asking "Why" is not disrespectful to the victims, nor is it disrespectful to pay careful attention to who benefits from a thing that has happened or what use (political and otherwise) is being made of that thing. Your statement about being disgraceful is a non sequitur.
Lastly, regarding Islam, let me tell you something. I am a Biblical Christian, and not a Muslim. I will never convert to Islam. However, I think that Islam has been set up as a convenient scapegoat for decades, complete with its convenient stereotype of the typical Muslim as some emotional, crazed, violent fanatic who goes around killing people solely because he "hates their freedoms!!!!!" You are a self-professed homosexual, and yet it is ironic that you are spouting the same sort of stereotyped cliches that the American Religious Right spouted after 9/11. (Here are two books to check out: The Blood of the Moon, and Islam Unveiled. The latter book must have set a world speed record for being written and published within a few short months after the 9/11 attacks. (It was published on January 1, 2002!) Rather odd, considering that for a long time, the typical time to publish a book from the finishing of the author's manuscript was two years.)
A closer look at the reality of Islam in the world today - if you actually care to take a look - will reveal a much more diverse body of practitioners than you may have realized. You will understand that there are divisions within Islam that are very similar in many ways to the denominations of Christianity. You would also have discovered a host of Islamic countries where the values of community and hospitality are so deeply ingrained in the culture that Western visitors are blown away by the kindnesses they receive. (Check out some bicycle touring blogs if you don't believe me - like "To Catch A Rainbow (Somewhere In Iran)", "Iran Alborz Mountains", and TravellingTwo.)
Anonymous, you've been living in a toxic bubble of American propaganda for too long. Step away from the Kool-Aid, please...
For the rest of my readers, my next blog post will describe the ways in which the campaign of Donald Trump has been using the Orlando mass shooting.
Monday, June 13, 2016
Reichstagsbrand II
Image taken from The Dreadful Story of Pauline and the Matches, Heinrich Hoffmann, 1858
So there was another mass shooting this weekend, and as usual, I found out about it several hours after it happened, since I have no TV. And once again, an Arab with ties to ISIS is being blamed for the massacre. And once again, I am inclined to think that this was a false flag attack. For one thing, the alleged assailant is no longer alive to stand trial or to defend himself. (How convenient!) For another thing, the alleged assailant proclaimed his allegiance to ISIS just before the attack, and as I have written previously, ISIS has served the United States well as a conveniently manufactured bogeyman (just as Al-Qaeda did before ISIS). Indeed, there are too many similarities between this attack and previous highly questionable "terror attacks" that have taken place within the last two years.
For those who think that all Arabs - or all Muslims - are incredibly emotional, fanatic, and stupid, consider this. Any sane person does not pick a fight with an opponent unless there is a good strategy for winning. Senseless, high-drama "terror attacks" perpetrated by the Muslim world do not fall into the category of a good strategy for winning. Rather, those who perpetrate such attacks merely strengthen the hand of their adversaries. If the Muslim world was actually trying to pick a fight with the West (or especially, with the red-white-and blue Cowboy on a White Horse), surely they would use a smarter strategy than this.
So who benefits from such terror attacks? Is it not the same people who have worked tirelessly in Europe to demonize immigrants and refugees, in order to exclude them and loot their countries? And who now is the chief spokesman and proponent of pushing the United States to do the same thing? The spokesman I am thinking of has indeed gone into full loose cannon mode over the last 24 hours. He has made himself the point man for a group of people who have long been used to supremacy and a unipolar world which they regarded as their oyster. Now that such a world is slipping from their grasp, they are full of rage and terror. Such emotions can move people to do some really creepy things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)